The status of each country can be recognized by the ranking of its universities and academic achievement of university students. When it comes to the quality of universities, controversy surrounds the issue of whether considerable budget should be allocated for facilities such as laboratories rather than for salaries of distinguished professors to be hired. Some people are of the opinion that famous professors are able to provide the latest information for students, resulting in submitting more international articles. I believe, however, improvement of facilities would be more advantageous for students at universities due to the the following reasons.
One of the most interesting aspects of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that equipping a university with a wide variety of facilities and conveniences would enhance the scope of students’ knowledge. Without technology and highly advanced equipment in a laboratory, a student who studies engineering cannot expand his knowledge In order to get accurate data and precise graphs, because he needs to work with tools, working accurately. In this case, he is able to rely on his data to continue the rest of his experiments. Moreover, if he faces some problems while carrying out his researches, having easy access to other facilities such as high speed Internet connection and advanced library enable him to get various information. As you can see, all his problems can be solved without needing to famous teachers.
Another noteworthy aspect of the ongoing discussion which needs to be reflected is that just hiring well-informed teachers could not guarantee improvement of both universities and students. These professors are too busy to devote their precious times even during office hours for students’ problems to be dealt with. In fact, they pay more attention to their own research areas and publishing better articles in well-known journals. In addition, most of the time, when students are considering taking their specialized courses with them, their classes are full. In other words, their classes have no sufficient capacity for all students to take advantages from their experience and information. Consequently, most students are deprived of benefitting from education and knowledge of famous professors.
To sum up, both making the best use of the established facilities at universities by all students and developing their research areas are the results of spending huge amount of budget on facilitating university, which benefits both professors and students effectively. I hope that all governments understand how important the role of universities are in progressing a society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 634, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ous for students at universities due to the the following reasons. One of the most i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 634, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ous for students at universities due to the the following reasons. One of the most i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rses with them, their classes are full. In other words, their classes have no suff...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in fact, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55582524272 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22486784206 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2852350236 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.647058824 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2352941176 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160744354646 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505246524802 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407484656979 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936163550714 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386596464159 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.