Assessing of what people have done has always played an important role in their improvements. In this regard, some people believe that watching the records of presentation by themselves is superior to inviting audiences to discuss it; whereas I have enough reasons to object to this point of view, and I will illustrate two of which in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, people have distinctive viewpoints and can consider a subject fairly, so if I invite other attenders to discuss and give their ideas about my presentation, I will achieve a comprehensive consideration with which I can improve my knowledge in that field. To put it in a more vivid picture, as we know to each his own, so people can contemplate my presentation from unique points of view, which means everyone can see my flaws from his or her own perspective. In addition, it is possible that I see a subject unfairly, so others can help me to perceive it without any bias. Take my presentation about roads in my country, for instance. I had an assumption about the roads of north of Iran, and I thought they were the best ones in my country since my hometown is in the north of Iran. However, when my friends and I discussed it after that presentation, I figured out that there are a number of better roads in different region of Iran.
Secondly, inviting audiences to give their opinions, I have the opportunity to find new methods in order to improve my presentation skills. To clarify this point, everyone has his or her special way of presentation, so they can help me to figure out how to improve my ability in that case if they describe their methods and give me my drawbacks. As a way of illustration, take my own experience. When I was in university, I had to present a subject about high-performance concrete. Having presented my research, I invited my friends to talk about it. They gave me a lot of new ideas about how to enhance my way of presenting. For one thing, one of them told me to look my audiences frequently since it can improve my confidence during presentations; while I used to only watch my notes when I was explaining that subject. As a result, I used those methods in my other presentations, which made me so confident that all my professors thanked me about my great presentations.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that inviting audiences to discuss and give their ideas about my presentation is more beneficial than watching records of that by myself for appraising my presentation. It is due to the fact that, not only, can I achieve a comprehensive consideration about it, but also I can find new methods to enhance my presentation skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, for one thing, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 94.0 43.0788530466 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69361702128 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05137836297 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459574468085 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.0679589007 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105139174248 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445322601207 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411516701134 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865356828661 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205687802739 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.