Agree or disagree? Teachers should not make their social and political views known to students in the classroom. (Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion)
It is undeniable that teachers and students relationship strongly affects the education process. It either enhances its productivity or make it useless mission. In my view, teachers should not their social or political views known to students in the classroom because that will separate students into teams which will have a negative effect in the class room, and waste studying time.
To begin with, when the teacher shares his social or political views with students, some of them will agree with him and others will disagree. Their is no problem with students who agree with the teachers, but any student disagrees with his opinion will refuse to listen or understand anything from that teacher. For instance, my brother Rami used to like Spanish football team. His science professor kept saying bad words about them because he was a big fan of German team. My brother failed his science test, and when ever he had a class with that professor, he spent his time sleeping at the disk. He said his failing was due to bad teaching techniques from that professor which made him unable to understand anything from him. In my view, what happend with Rami is not related to the way of teaching, but it is because my brother refuses to get any information from someone disagrees with him, so if the same teacher was with different opinion or did not display his favorite team, Rami will have different act in the classroom.
Second, spending time to take about what the teacher thinks is a waste of important time. The lesson usually is an hour or a little bit more, which means the teacher barely have time to complete the curriculum, so it is better for him and stedents to spend each minute talking about something related to the subject of the class. For example, last year, I had a French course with a goal to learn how to speak fluently at the end of it. However, the lecturer was very talkative, she spent our course time speaking about her kids and the best way to deal with teenagers, which were completely unrelated to our topic. At the end of the course, no one was able to speak or even understand French dialogs.
In conclusion, teachers should not make their views known not only because it is a waste of time, but it will negatively affect students' understanding. Moreover, I suggest that teahers should have a formal relationship with their students to make sure that the education process will be smooth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...gree with him and others will disagree. Their is no problem with students who agree w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is usually
...s a waste of important time. The lesson usually is an hour or a little bit more, which mea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ime. The lesson usually is an hour or a little bit more, which means the teacher barely ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, speaking about, talking about, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73696682464 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47478354234 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0820852617 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.588235294 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215940249192 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756606890087 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886033300879 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170017313001 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105578371346 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.