Agreement or disagreement: in order to be well-informed, a person must get info from many different news sources.
Recently, there has been a growing body of opinion in my country in favor of the ways of getting news in order to be well-informed and keep up with latest news around the world. People's attitude differ greatly toward this issue. Some of them says, that the acquisition of the news from TV is enough in order to keep the one informed about the latest news . Others have negative attitude. They subscribe to this view that using different sources of news can be of greater help in order to move the one forward in being informed and up-to-dated. Looks like this topic is still open to question. However, as far as I am concerned I have confidence in this idea that both aspects of the topic, including positive and negative ones deserve to be assessed under sufficient thinking time and deliberation to determine what the correct path is. To evaluate that, no less than three conspicuous detailed reasons and concrete examples have been put forward below to uphold the explanation.
At the beginning, the most influential aspect of the topic involves in some limitation that prevents the broadcasters to give the true news. In nearly every country, involvement of some political issues might prevent the newscasters of telling the true news for example: the war news. In circumstances like these people are supposed to use other sources of news to receive the true news. The more types of sources they use, the better they can keep up with the latest news .
Another crucial factor, which seems to be significant enough to be taken into consideration falls back on not receiving all the details from a special kind of news resource. To put it simply, not all the details can be conceived from one of type of source of news. Some sources considers the bold information to instantly inform people but others prefer to give a detailed-news to better fill general public in. For instance: TV broadcasters do not have enough time to give all the details about a special event and prefer to give the highlighted ones.
Unlike, the two abovementioned reasons, the third one concentrates on the misleading role of getting news from various sort of source of news. In other words, getting info about a special event broadcasting on TV by utilizing different kinds of source may play a mislead role since each source tells some of the information and does not give the whole detail. Therefore, this facet of the topic requires to be given more and more thought.
In the long run, although some drawbacks are associated with getting news from various kinds of news source such as leading one to misunderstand the true news, when all factors are contemplated the paramount factors of the topic in support of using different sources of news carry more weight. Therefore, from what have been discussed above, the conclusion, which may be intertwined at the beginning of the discussion and thus become more persuasive may safely accentuate that the idea of getting news from different kinds of sources is not fail and can make a great sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...n order to be well-informed and keep up with latest news around the world. Peoples attitud...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll-informed and keep up with latest news around the world. Peoples attitude diffe...
^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...p the one informed about the latest news . Others have negative attitude. They sub...
^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er they can keep up with the latest news . Another crucial factor, which seems ...
^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'consider'.
Suggestion: consider
...of type of source of news. Some sources considers the bold information to instantly info...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e sources considers the bold information to instantly inform people but others pr...
^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... to give a detailed-news to better fill general public in. For instance: TV broadcasters do no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...zing different kinds of source may play a mislead role since each source tells some of th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... a mislead role since each source tells some of the information and does not give the whole...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, sort of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 98.0 52.1666666667 188% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86293436293 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67615967784 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484555984556 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4512341352 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.952380952 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231229889495 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773188148106 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610484955193 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144348070977 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430361639189 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.