Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people

Interpersonal communication is essential for every individual in this society, and I wholeheartedly agree with the statement that honesty is the most valuable consideration in any relationship between people. I feel this was for two reasons, which I will illuminate in the following essay.

For intimate relationships like family and couples, telling the truth is necessary. Since people in such a relationship will deal with each other every day, you have no choice but to expose yourself truly. I would like to start with my own experience. I have a girlfriend who has been my fiance. And during the maintenance of this romantic relationship, we were always generous concerning admiration. We praised (or overstated the fact )each other for merely a petty achievement to express the positive emotions that we gained from each other. Recently, I found out that the pattern of interaction between us has changed. It did not mean we stopped appreciating each other, but we tended to thoroughly discuss the essence of each other. We endeavored to display and state the deepest part of ourselves to ensure whether or not we were a suitable couple. In other words, being honest to your loved one was a signal to move to the next relationship stage. And now, we are engaged. My own experience convinces me that the key to the promotion of an intimate relationship is to become frank about behaving yourself and embrace the facts even though they are a little harsh.

For not intimate relationships like strangers, telling the truth is also indispensable. However, we need to choose a sensible approach to telling the truth in order to avoid hurting others' feelings. For instance, I once got a part-time job as a salesman, which offered me many opportunities to contact strangers. One day, I treated a consumer who was going to buy a flash drive to copy teaching applications. So I guessed he was a teacher who had to give a speech in front of students. However, there was something on his teeth, and he did not realize it. The students would certainly notice it, which was awkward. Following careful consideration, I served him a cup of water with a note to remind him, and I left for a moment. He was so thankful that he even sent my manager a letter to express his feelings a week later. Therefore, I think telling the truth itself is innocent. But how to convey that truth is challenging.

In conclusion, I firmly believe honesty is of vital importance during interpersonal actions, either for the intimate or for strangers.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...the deepest part of ourselves to ensure whether or not we were a suitable couple. In other wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, as for, for instance, i feel, i guess, i think, in conclusion, in other words, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01124267986 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555813953488 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7250084645 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7692307692 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88461538462 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203140660143 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502797346984 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683478164915 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105644343829 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427635063322 0.0645574589148 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...the deepest part of ourselves to ensure whether or not we were a suitable couple. In other wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, as for, for instance, i feel, i guess, i think, in conclusion, in other words, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01124267986 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555813953488 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7250084645 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7692307692 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88461538462 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203140660143 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502797346984 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683478164915 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105644343829 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427635063322 0.0645574589148 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.