In areas where there are many restaurants, some people prefer to buy their meals inrestaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant. Whic

Essay topics:

In areas where there are many restaurants, some people prefer to buy their meals in

restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant. Which one would you choose and why?

It goes without saying that wholesome foods which people eat in meals play an important role in their health. Some people prefer to go to restaurants and buy their meals, while many people hold another opinion, stating that it is better to cook most of their meals at home and prefer to go to restaurants rarely. I, personally, concur with the latter group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.

First of all, cooking meals at home is more reliable for people than buying meals from restaurants. In fact, the emergence of scared diseases and different types of cancer resulted from unhealthy foods, as well as an increase in the number of people suffering from heart problems, causes that people allocate more attention to their meal choices. As a result, people who cook their meals at home know exactly which material they are using and could control the amount of oil and salt in their foods, unlike the restaurants which use much oil and salt to create delicious taste, increasing their customers. For example, my brother who was a student in another city, almost went out for lunch and dinner because he did not like cooking; after a while, he suffered high blood pressure because of the high amount of salt. Now, it makes many problems for him in daily activities and always should measure and control his blood pressure. Therefore, cooking safe and healthy food at home positively affects people's health.

Secondly, cooking at home helps people to save more money than when they buy meals from restaurants. In other words, preparing raw materials for cooking such as rice, oil, meat, and so on needs less money than buying prepared foods, because the restaurants usually have a lot of labor, any of which should be paid salary monthly. Therefore, it is rational that the price of their meals is more than their real value. Consequently, people prefer to pay less money and cook their favorite foods. For example, when I was a student, I allotted a part of my income for buying my meals from the restaurant because I did not have enough time to spend cooking. After a month, I accounted for my spent money and realized that if I bought raw material and cooked by myself, I would save a lot of money, helping me do other activities such as buying my favorite books. As a result, cooking at home help people to reduce their expenses allocated to daily meals.

To conclude, for the above reasons, cooking meals at home is more beneficial than buying them from restaurants. Not only is it more reliable in terms of health and wholesomeness, preventing from suffering various diseases, but also it helps people save more money rather than spending their money buying foods which are undervalued.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...at home and prefer to go to restaurants rarely. I, personally, concur with the latter ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 951, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir expenses allocated to daily meals. To conclude, for the above reasons, cook...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8156779661 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47283339918 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0799216065 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.277777778 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438500690894 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172006455451 0.076458572812 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125133989483 0.0737576698707 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305017980101 0.150856017488 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495885624096 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.