assigning projects to students alone or as a team
Wether team work and developing a quality as a well coordinator with other people is an effective quality or not, depends on the lens through which one is looking. Some may believe the path to success is a road best travelled alone, while others may argue success means so little when not shared with a team. All that said, I agree that when students are assigned to project to work on as agroup, they will learn more effectively. I will demonstrate my ideas as follows.
Firstly, when working as a team, students provide and also, observe different angles to look at a problem. Every student contributes to the project with their own specific skills and tools of mind. Thus, if one individual has a weakness in one field, it can still be covered by other members of the team and simoltaneously, maintain an environment in which students can learn about how to improve their weaknesses. Let us imagine a group of medical students who are supposed to put up a presentation about renal diseases. While one of them may be an expert on infantile diseases, the other could provide the information on etiology, and the third one may make the PowerPoint and teach the others how it is done. They could all participate in informative educational disscussions and learn greatly from each other.
Secondly, other than subject specific advantages, the ability to cooperate with others and being a good team member, is a quality needed in almost every line of work today. Most careers require good social interactions, cooperation with colleagues, knowing how to interact with superiors and subordinates, and how to be a an effective team player, in general. Moreover, many jobs provide customer-based services and therefore, they require very advanced social skills. Hence, students working as team may provide them the training needed, to enhance a personality trait which is much needed in today's competitive career market.
In conclusion, I believe that students working as a team to deliver a project is the more effective and proficient option on the basis that it may escalate their knowledge and skills in that specicific area and also, team work as a student provides the required practice for how to be an efficient group member in their future jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... through which one is looking. Some may believe the path to success is a road best trav...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...periors and subordinates, and how to be a an effective team player, in general. M...
^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: a; an
...periors and subordinates, and how to be a an effective team player, in general. More...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97354497354 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80999707051 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534391534392 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.244463081 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23228352258 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815912842151 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740470279096 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158684576891 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417144305282 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.