to be successful is it more important to focus on studyin hard at school or relating well to people?
When adressing success and what the qualities of a successful person is, everyone has their own specific criteria, and we can not lable them any of wrong. All that said, I disagree with the statement that to be successful in a future career one has to develop the ability to relate well to people more than they have to do good in school. I will demonstrate my ideas on the subject as follows.
Firstly, academic resume, as we all know, plays a significant role in obtaining a job opportunity, the quality of the wokplace, the amount of salary, and the privileges a position offers. Overall, the chances a person has to reach their ideal lifestyle may depend on how they conduct their studies in their years of school. To demostrate further, let us consider an opening in a high ranking high paying hospital for a cardiologist. Evidently, among the doctors applying for the job, I believe that the one graduated from Harvard with the highest of scores gets a much more serious consideration.
Moreover, while in some jobs the providers need to maintain good interactive relations with people such as salemen, realstates, teachers and so on, some carriers are run in almost entirely solo environments like writters, programmers, archeologists and many others. I believe that one can not generalize the idea that being capable to relate to people well is the key to advancing people in their career roads. For example, we can think of scientist working in a labratory on sensitive matters, with none or perhaps one associate. Surely we can assume that this particular scientist's success in their field depends much more on their knowledge and studies rather than their relatability to people.
Finally, in my opinion relatability and being sensible towards people is an attainable quality and can be practiced and developed in a shorter period of time. On the other hand, there is a time limit on the subject of school studies. Also, the courses we have in school are not familiar subjects taught through a person's life, but they are specially desigened to get people ready for a career. In other words, one can learn them efficiently only in school. on the contrary, communication skills are abilities that we have been learning probably since we started talking and developed awareness.
In conclusion, I believe that to be successful and skillful in a future job, a person should devote most of their time to study hard at school and the next less significant step would be the quality of relating well to people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...rely we can assume that this particular scientists success in their field depends much mor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...be practiced and developed in a shorter period of time. On the other hand, there is a time lim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... not familiar subjects taught through a persons life, but they are specially desigened ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... learn them efficiently only in school. on the contrary, communication skills are ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91803278689 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77700016112 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.999183907 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.529411765 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6470588235 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264303945456 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816273854093 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914546805053 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16838815749 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849869308495 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.