Since life has become increasingly complex in the 21st century, young people must plan and organize to keep pace with the rapid development of the world.
What should be prioritized is that the capability of planning is of great importance. For one thing, the ability to plan helps young people do well in academic studies. The direction of effort is even more critical than ever for academic success. If we do not plan while studying, we might go in the wrong direction. For instance, to write an appropriate essay for the topic, we must create an outline and consider a good paragraph structure. For another, the ability to plan helps young people achieve in professional careers. Since young people are busy with work, love, and chores, only by dividing things into stages can they track their progress and improve their motivation and efficiency in developing careers.
What should be equally worth discussing is that organizing competence is another crucial requirement for young people. More specifically, teamwork is a typical approach to enhancing organizing ability. We must ensure team members understand our thoughts, ideas, and outcomes. With careful organization, it is possible to realize our blueprints.
In conclusion, effective planning and organization can help young people save time, increase their productivity, point the way forward, and enable better communication with others in today's modern, dynamic, complex society. Therefore, young people need to extend their abilities to plan and organize.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 238.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43697478992 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85648781418 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63025210084 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.043618492 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4285714286 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355887688457 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11840029746 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983557673657 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213621102351 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704483088039 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.