I strongly disagree with the statement that people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. I believe that it is necessary and even desirable for us that the world is changing quickly. Quick world change has some different advantages that make people happy and satisfied with their lives.
One reason for my fundamental agreement with the statement is the internet. The internet is one of the biggest changes in our world. In my point of view, the internet plays an important role in human life. Many people can communicate with their family or friends who are far from them, so people are happier than past because the internet helps them to maintain a stable relationship, however, in the past people lost their relationship with people who far away. Another effect of the internet in human life is information is sharing on websites, sometimes people need to obtain or extract their necessary data about a special subject, so people can extract their information faster rather than go to the library and search in printed material from books.
Another reason why I disagree with the statement is the advancement of technology. Our society has witnessed how our life has improved because of the advancement of technology, People can do the task faster and have sufficient time to spent other important tasks. For example, these days transportation are faster than in past, so this issue make people happy and satisfy their lives, however, these facilities are not provided all of the worlds.
Another reason is that education methods. Today, we are dealing with the Corona Virus, many students are restricted from university and school, various education methods are using to the student to making them more productive. Imagine Corona Virus was happened in past, in my point of view many people could not follow their studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e happy and satisfied with their lives. One reason for my fundamental agreement ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... search in printed material from books. Another reason why I disagree with the s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...her important tasks. For example, these days transportation are faster than in past,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ese days transportation are faster than in past, so this issue make people happy and sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ever, these facilities are not provided all of the worlds. Another reason is that edu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies are not provided all of the worlds. Another reason is that education methods...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...tive. Imagine Corona Virus was happened in past, in my point of view many people could ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people could not follow their studies.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02884615385 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56140683615 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522435897436 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1961650049 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.45110844103 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504894331241 0.236089414692 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157193190208 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181413181104 0.0737576698707 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309511241761 0.150856017488 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.221125538757 0.0645574589148 343% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.