The best way to improve the quality of education at a university is to increase salaries of teachers.
Almost every university agrees that quality of education must be improved for them to attract students and stand on top. In my opinion, one of the best ways to strengthen quality in education is to improve incentives of teachers. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, high amount of salary keeps the teachers confident in class lectures and frees from financial difficulties, which are the two things that tutors often struggle with. If they do struggle, they cannot deliver quality content to the students. Looking at the past few decades, the price of common commodities has got to its peak. Not only teachers, but also individuals with other various professions often find difficulties in financial matters. My own experience is a compelling example of this. After finishing my undergraduate degree, I started mentoring mathematics in high school as a full time teacher. However, due to low salary amount, I used to feel discouraged and upset. On top of that, I had to pay for my rent, water and electricity bills which were really high. As a result, I ended up having a part time job at the evening. I started losing focus on my subject and I was not confident enough in class due to a lot of stress. I could not perform as I committed to my students. However, when my salary was increased in subsequent years, I did not continue my part time job and really started focusing on my students. As a result, students progressed a lot in my class compared to previous years.
Secondly, teachers can manage printed notes and supplementary study materials, with which students can have more learning opportunities. For a quality education, relying on a single textbook is not enough. On other hand, students usually do not buy many textbooks and study materials for a single subject. If teacher can manage printed notes collected from many different sources, it can turn out to be an asset for students. As I said above, when my salaries were low, I faced a lot of financial difficulties and I couldn’t manage printed notes for students. When my salary was increased, not only I was able to solve my problems and feel confident, but also was able to collect contents from various sources, and print them as handouts for students. As a result, students were highly motivated and they started scoring really well in exams.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that for a quality education, salaries of teachers must be increased. This is because with high salary, teachers are motivated enough for confident and quality lectures and can manage printed handouts for the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ntoring mathematics in high school as a full time teacher. However, due to low salary amo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... high. As a result, I ended up having a part time job at the evening. I started losing fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1084, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...subsequent years, I did not continue my part time job and really started focusing on my s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...can manage printed notes collected from many different sources, it can turn out to be an asset...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, then, well, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89755011136 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81025095481 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489977728285 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.726606332 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.96 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.96 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.32 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17786877257 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516277115697 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841221736409 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138932603387 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123771187448 0.0645574589148 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.