Telling the truth is always the most important consideration in any relationship.
There are number of different factors people like to take into account in any relationship. Usually people look for honesty, loyalty, understanding, maturity etc! In my opinion, telling the truth is very important to sustain as well as strengthen any kind of relationship. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, telling the truth helps to maintain the trust among people, which is one thing that most individuals often struggle with. Strong relationships always have a greater bond of trust among them. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Last summer, I worked in a forensic research lab which was kind of pioneering research institute in my country. While working in lab, I mistakenly used an expensive chemical in wrong place and wasted it. Everyone in the lab suggested me to hide the truth and say nothing to professor. However, I went to my professor’s office and honestly told him that it was a mistake and I would become more prudent in the future regarding lab activities. Unlike everybody’s speculations, his response turned out to be opposite. He was happy that I took the responsibility honestly. Moreover, he came to lab and suggested every lab members to act honestly like I did. On top of that, he started noticing me in every steps and I got very valuable time from him whenever I needed. Not only our relation progressed, but also I had a great learning opportunity due to the trust that developed between us.
Secondly, telling the truth can avoid potential loss and harm, which is often very important in professional relationship. In offices and industries, there is no any room for lies and dishonesty because it can lead into significant damage. As I said above, the chemical that I wasted was very expensive. Later I knew that not only it required greater cost, but also it had very dangerous health hazards when exposed to the environment. As soon as I told my professor about the incident, labs were evacuated and neutralizing agents were used for two days before resuming lab activities any further. If I had kept it secret, though my professor would not know it for certain time, we would have been exposed to hazards like skin burns and might lead to cancer in long term as well. For this reason, everyone in lab was suggested to speak truth and not mask any wrong activities.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that speaking truth honestly helps to strengthen any form of relationships. This is because; it helps to develop trust between the parties and can avoid any kind pernicious circumstances in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ip. In offices and industries, there is no any room for lies and dishonesty becaus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, honestly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88392857143 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90868342276 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4305846783 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1666666667 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214864483681 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555415135087 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762433314896 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139972568028 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05135732024 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.