The best way to increase students’ interest in a subject is to explain to them how this subject can help them in their lives outside the school.
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented boom in the economy, thus citizens’ awareness of schooling has been sparked. They initiate to ponder the question that which is the best way that helps us to engage students’ interest in a subject. Some individuals reckon that explaining the subject’s function in students’ lives outside the school is an optimal choice. Personally speaking, I cannot concur with this opinion and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, the direct exposure to a certain subject is a better way to trigger students’ interest in the subject. Nowadays, majorities of students are burdened with excessive school assignments, they do not have sufficient time and energy to explore the wonderland or have a thorough understanding of the affairs existing in the world, not to mention the specific subject. Hence, when they are introduced to a certain subject, those tender students, who are not mature enough to comprehend the subject’s utilization, are likely to get confused and perplexed. Thus, this approach finally ends up biting children in the downside or dampening their enthusiasm for certain subjects. On the contrary, provided that children are directly exposed to certain subjects, they are entitled to have a straightforward image of those subjects, which enables them to be fascinated by such subjects. Here is a case in the point. When my cousin needed to decide his major, he was admonished by both his teachers and parents that artificial intelligence is a promising field. However, owing to the dearth of knowledge in the domain of artificial intelligence, he was reluctant to give the final decision. At the same time, an exhilarating opportunity was given to him that he could visit a local tech giant company. After he paid a visit to the company which develops the cutting-edge technology products, he found that he was really fond of software engineering, thus he quickly gave his final decision to choose artificial intelligence as his major for the future 4 years. This example illuminates that direct exposure does exert an advantageous effect on intriguing children’s interest compared to the tedious explanation of the subject’s utilization.
What’s more, the pedagogical methods employed by teachers also play a pivotal role in sparking children’s interest. To be more specific, a bunch of students are kinesthetic or visual learners, thus if they are taught in a traditional way, they are more likely to feel bored when they are plowing through the profound knowledge. On the contrary, provided that teachers can employ some animation movies and digital games, their enthusiasm for studying will be greatly elevated.
Admittedly, explaining to students about how the subject is helpful for them in their lives outside the school do have some effects in increasing students’ interests. Nevertheless, such interests cannot sustain in a relatively long period since there is a high propensity that those students, who are utilitarian, eventually find the subject is too tedious for them to stand. As a result, they grind the process of learning a certain subject to a cease and their previous efforts waste.
In a nutshell, I would like to reiterate my view that it is not a terrific approach to engaging students’ interests by explaining the subject’s utilization to them, because the facts have proven that there are other methods that are more efficacious can be adopted, for instance, letting students to have a direct exposure to certain subjects or adopting more intriguing pedagogical methods to inculcate knowledge in replace of the traditional one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...isual learners, thus if they are taught in a traditional way, they are more likely to feel bored whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, thus, for instance, as a result, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3117.0 1977.66487455 158% => OK
No of words: 580.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37413793103 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20712781888 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 978.3 618.680645161 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.7171447347 48.9658058833 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.681818182 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415759828021 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119139225551 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127915264059 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256830697462 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120417542632 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 86.8835125448 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.