Business should hire employees for their entire lives
Businesses always dealing with this issue whether they keep employees for their entire lives or not. Although many people believe that it is their right to have insurance of having the job for their rest of life, the real world shows something else. Due to a competitive business world, I personally suppose that guaranteeing an employee to have the job until retirement is not reasonable and I have a myriad of remarkable reasons for my assertion two of which will be elaborated subsequently.
To begin with, nowadays, marketing atmosphere turns into a battle scene. The weaker will be eliminated by stronger. Therefore, businesses need to be more creative and updated every second. So what can keep the company update? Of course, it's employees. Moreover, they are familiar with new technology, they can do their job better. To show the reliance of up to date employee with the policy that claims they have to be hired for entire life, consider a person who is sure that he or she will not be fired any time, is he or she willing to raise his or her knowledge? One of the factors which make the progress way easier is the activeness of people who work together and one way to make them so, is to inform them, they are always been required for a specific level of activeness. In that case, they become more efficient and try to develop their entrepreneurial skills.
Another equally outstanding reason to be mentioned is that during the economic crisis or marketing problems, some companies are forced to reduce the number of their employees. Since they cannot predict these crises, it becomes irrational to promise the staff the job forever. Additionally, the cost of keeping the employees, I mean salary, become unaffordable for companies. As an instance, the company which I was working for last year faced with the financial issue and the managers decided to modify cost for handling the problem by firing some of the staffs.
To make a long story short, having discussed the topic from two controversial points of view, it is fair to say that in today's life, it is unavoidable for business to warranty employees that their occupations are for their entire lives. Since not only does this policy effects badly on employees' performance and efficiency, but also it costs too much for a company to pay them in the economic crisis.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Businesses always dealing with this issu...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich will be elaborated subsequently. To begin with, nowadays, marketing atmos...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...develop their entrepreneurial skills. Another equally outstanding reason to be...
^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cost for handling the problem by firing some of the staffs. To make a long story short,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... problem by firing some of the staffs. To make a long story short, having discu...
^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... only does this policy effects badly on employees performance and efficiency, but also it...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...any to pay them in the economic crisis. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, i mean, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.845 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69985340351 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7743981401 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311265429627 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849988527512 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1018253994 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201308121261 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910289002342 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.