Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific examples and reasons to support your answer
There is a lot of debate about whether it is better that entrepreneurs should hire employees for their whole lives or not. There is no doubt that everyone wants to be employed and to continue his or her overall career time at one organization as far as possible. I do strongly disagree with this, that businesses ought to engage people for their entire business life. I will elaborate on the reasons why I feel this way in the following essay.
To begin with, businesspersons should pick up most knowledgeable applicants. In order to make an inordinate amount of profits, corporates tend to appoint efficient staff members. As a result, an employer that is not satisfied by his worker’s performance will prefer the better one as a replacement. An old friend of mine is a compelling example of this. After working as an accountable, my friend has been dismissed of his occupation. He was extremely industrious and aware of the latest software relevant to his major. But the company which he has employed was an international corporation, therefore he should have known English language but he did not, so they had to employ someone else. Had he been able to communicate with multinational companies, they might never have fired him.
Secondly, employees would become more delinquent, as they would be certain that they would never lose their job. This attitude by itself could fail so many businesses. If staffs are confident that they will be able to work in their job as long as they please and will not become unemployed, presumably, they would have a propensity to not bent over backward and sacrifice themselves for their managers. Moreover, probably other workers will be influenced by this fact, because the more we associate with others, the easier we be influenced. Therefore, their productivity would ratchet down, leading businesses to close or to claim their bankruptcy.
In conclusion, businesses not only tend to recruit a well-informed workforce, but also they prefer to collaborate with people who are expected to carry out their duties conscientiously. By taking all above-mentioned arguments into consideration, employees should broaden their horizons plus attempt to adjust their own knowledge with the latest state-of-the-art technology
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a lot of debate about whether i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... feel this way in the following essay. To begin with, businesspersons should pi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, they might never have fired him. Secondly, employees would become more de...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... close or to claim their bankruptcy. In conclusion, businesses not only tend ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i feel, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20218579235 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12293528196 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609289617486 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9347398639 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.210526316 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167075535789 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506824378596 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684548273813 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114144583149 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791949649147 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.