Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, a question arises in the human resource literature. Should we hire permanent employees or temporary employees? Although it is controversial to human resource experts and some of them are agree but some are disagree, I think hiring permanent employees is a big mistake. Actually, permanent job reduce employee's motivation, make them more unskilled and they become an obstacle to other's and fresh employers' promotions.
First of all, Employees that are hired for entire lives are not as motivated as temporary and project based- employees. They have job security and their salary is depend on their experience in the organization, not based-on their performance. Thus, they are not motivated and enthusiastic to increase their performance. In similar vein, their job security give them a sense of assurance that no one can't fire them. For example, my uncle is an accountant in a large public institution. He says that we just doing daily task without any passion to improve the procedure. They stuck in old rules and they don't afraid of making a mistake in their job because they just fined. Thus, permanent employees are less motivated, so, they have less performance.
Next, permanent employees are unskilled in many aspects. They just doing their regular duties. Because they are permanent, they don't need to spend time to learn new skills and computer software. Furthermore, people can learn new skills in new places which permanent employees doesn't have chance to experience a new work place. For instance, I have to allocate time to participate in workshops and training classes to learn new skills because I am a temporary employee in organizations. When project finish, my job is finish at the organization too. But my friend is employed in Bank for entire of life and he is skilled in an old software. He says that learning new software isn't necessary because he don't need it.
Finally, being hired for a longtime increase permanent employees' expectation which only they can have a top-management positions. This perspective can damage fresh employees' motivation and passion. It is always s suggested by experienced employees to young people that don't try lot, as long as you are freshmen, top management positions belongs to experienced employees. Even, experienced employees may prevent other's promotion because they afraid of their passion and knowledge.
In conclusion, as I mentioned above, hiring employees for entire of life isn't a good idea. Such plans is harmful to organization in long term. It kills organization's creativity and employees' passion, make unskilled employees like a worker and reduce new employees' eagerness to get promoted and help organization to reach their goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...n resource experts and some of them are agree but some are disagree, I think hiring p...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...and some of them are agree but some are disagree, I think hiring permanent employees is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...y have job security and their salary is depend on their experience in the organization...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e them a sense of assurance that no one cant fire them. For example, my uncle is an ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...edure. They stuck in old rules and they dont afraid of making a mistake in their job...
^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uties. Because they are permanent, they dont need to spend time to learn new skills ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...in new places which permanent employees doesnt have chance to experience a new work pl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 676, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...are. He says that learning new software isnt necessary because he dont need it. F...
^^^^
Line 5, column 702, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... new software isnt necessary because he dont need it. Finally, being hired for a ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...hired for a longtime increase permanent employees expectation which only they can have a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ions. This perspective can damage fresh employees motivation and passion. It is always s ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...erienced employees to young people that dont try lot, as long as you are freshmen, t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: I_AFRAID[2]
Message: You miss the verb here. You should rather write: 'they're afraid'.
Suggestion: they're afraid
...es may prevent others promotion because they afraid of their passion and knowledge. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ve, hiring employees for entire of life isnt a good idea. Such plans is harmful to o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...re of life isnt a good idea. Such plans is harmful to organization in long term. I...
^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... employees like a worker and reduce new employees eagerness to get promoted and help orga...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26206896552 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95437092633 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501149425287 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.53276497 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7777777778 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 5.5376344086 289% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19728540217 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606534472586 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519699265371 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121207881015 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260196174152 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.