buying the new technology immediately after they arrive versus waiting
The significance of today's emergent of technologies in our world cannot be stealthy for anyone. What causes a heated debate is whether opting for the new technology instantly after looming prioritizes than hesitating to purchase it. Regardless pf appearing some marginally excruciating to reach a covenant on this issue, I am more inclined toward the credence that not hasting and being patient after arrival of one electronic device can carry a plethora of benefits for each person since this engenders some time to investigate all the advantages and drawbacks of that tool leading to buy it with more knowledge. My standpoint, in what follows, would demystify this thesis scrupulously. (109 words)
To initiate, the first reason vindicating the thesis is to be wise to utilize the experiences of other persons to make decisions more accurately. Going into the depth, having taken into account all aspects of one device derived from the experiences of the ones possessing it previously, one individual has a better election based on his circumstances; because what is useful for one person may not be positive for another and each should examine and observe what is best for him. The consequences of an investigation conducted in several families have divulged that the more the families stubbornly demonstrate bias and predilection to purchase one novel technology, the more regrets and compunctions are observed later. (115 words)
Afterward, to elucidate the thesis more vividly, to extenuate the amount of recycling and waste can be another influential element requiring to be pointed out. Simply stated, informed of ups and downs of the environment crisis, the persons should make their strengths to mitigate the amount of electronic trash entered the environment to conserve it for the next generation. As a matter of the fact, only when one electronic waste is abandoned in the nature, will it remain detrimental impacts that cannot be curable for many years since this kind of material is nonrenewable which cannot be decomposed after a surge of years. According to what is specified above, it is critically essential to implement the new device just when one requires it intensively. (124 words)
Drawing upon the reasons, demolishing the appearance of the environment and causing some problems due not to be appropriate device for all persons, after investigating all dimensions of one device, it is suggested to buy. Not only do the persons cope with a huge financial predicament by purchasing the new one, but also, they may be predisposed to lots of regrets. (61 words)
(430 words)
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19809069212 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99149040987 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568019093079 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.1806284956 48.9658058833 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.571428571 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9285714286 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968556891503 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360842874922 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430634141982 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700927098851 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555675971421 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.