Laws should not be stationary and fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take
account of various circumstances, times, and places
The significance of obeying the law to set rules and regulations in one society is not stealthy for anyone. Among a diversified constellation of perspectives, some may regard conserving the out-dated rules and to compel the citizens not to alter them takes precedence over making the laws adaptable to current. In contrast, others may persevere on unraveling the notion that justifying and transforming the laws in accordance with the needs of persons prioritize than pursuing the past laws. After weighing both dimensions, the latter one seems more plausible.
To inaugurate, the latter belief averring that making the rules up-to-date is vital to resolve the current issues can be scrutinized aptly. To put in general words, having obviated the difficulties and obstacles existing during the lives of individuals, the citizens may become more inclined toward obey the rules and regulations. Simply stated, they can feel and observe the efficacy of the rules in their lives more tangible, accordingly, they embrace them far better and more conveniently. Consequently, making the governments strength not to demonstrate resistance to change the laws can play as one of determining factors to ameliorate the condition of their societies. Additionally, they can have a chance to alleviate the malcontents and protests of citizens more logically. Thus, who could deny the necessity of tuning the laws based on today’s requirements?
Another angle demystifying the latter outlook is pragmatically beneficiary and a higher yield cannot be achieved without vindicating the change of rules in one colony. Going into the depth, only when one government has a keen eye to unearth the roots of challenges among its citizens, can it be anticipated that the hope of changing the regulations will be observed. To shed more light, the more the rulers of communities are well-rounded and broaden scope of knowledge, the less the prevalence of keep persisting on trops and conventional ideas will be dominated. To delineate, here the predominance of abandoning the dire and negative laws and traditions to obtain a profound and vigorous relationship between the government and the citizens to galvanize their communities toward a pinnacle of prosperity. If the new laws have more remarkable attention rather than the ancient ones, there is the possibility of facing a myriad of thriving and advancement in one society.
It is all transparent that what I mentioned above cannot be overgeneralized to whole contexts. There are some persons affirming that retaining old and dilapidated ideas and rules sound essential. As a matter of the fact, altering the rules according to the today’s critical situations may inhibit from the persons to pay attention to laws. Especially, in the cases about crimes, seldom do the individuals become engrossed into analyzing and pursuing the rules, as a result, they are more partial to infringe the human rights, to violate the criminals. Needless to say, in this circumstances, there will be a high susceptibility of the subsistence of anarchy in a society. Hence, what do persevering the old laws compare with supplanting them? It should be noted that hardly will all persons can be classified in this category.
Drawing upon the enumerated reasons, in spite of existing some exceptions deviated from the general rule, the benefits of conforming the rules based on the current issues of persons are too enormous to fathom. Not only, do the roots of collaboration and a sense of cooperation between the governments and citizens reinforce, but also it is much easier for the rulers to predispose the persons to obey them because people can feel the privileges of entering the new laws in their lives far better.
(597 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... conveniently. Consequently, making the governments strength not to demonstrate resistance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 833, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of prosperity. If the new laws have more remarkable attention rather than the anc...
^^
Line 4, column 578, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...late the criminals. Needless to say, in this circumstances, there will be a high sus...
^^^^
Line 4, column 784, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hem? It should be noted that hardly will all persons can be classified in this ca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, if, look, may, so, thus, well, in contrast, in general, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3158.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 599.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27212020033 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94716853372 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09205856933 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505843071786 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1008.9 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3001252005 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.583333333 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9583333333 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147152340346 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420729110626 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472392407916 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801761787054 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514224723844 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 184.0 100.480337079 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.