maintaining old friends is more important than finding the new one
The significance of the role of friends in human's life to foster as a real person, and to surmount the challenges existing in one's life is not stealthy for anyone. Prioritizing the old friends or the new persons as the main path propelling the one toward the prosperity serves as a heated dilemma. Regardless of appearing some marginally excruciating to reach a coherent decision about this issue, I persevere in unraveling the notion that making one' strength to unearth the new friends meet a plethora of difficulties and the invaluable treasure of experiences derived from the new persons is too enormous to fathom. To demystify this hypothesis, three postulations require to be investigated cogently.
The first angle to converge this belief is the subsistence of a surge of challenges to convince the new person. Going into the depth, having constructed a wall of trust, the one may provide the much needed opportunity to implant the roots of trustworthy to commence a profound friendship. Broadly speaking, persuading the new person about the personality and characteristics ubiquitous in one's requires lots of time, effort and proficiency. Based on the scientific research in the psychological province, the more the skills of how to enchant the attitudes of other persons, the less time protracts to build a new relationship.
Another assumption elucidating this thesis can be the difficulties in discovering the person who shares with your interest. Simply stated, only when two persons can comprehend each other in various dimensions, do they abnegate some blemishes and conflicts which may be conspicuous between them. For instance, during the time in which two individuals just try to tolerate each other without any symptoms of affection or love, it is anticipated that sooner or later, their friendship become disintegrated. Therefore, here the importance of common notions to augment the intimate interaction among the friends to sustain it perpetually can be sensed deeply.
The latter outlook pinpointing this concept is the new events and situations in one's life. To clarify, seldom does one not cope with circumstances in which they seem as uphill struggles and no one to propose the solutions to obviate them. Accordingly, finding the new persons who can provide the one new perspective to conquer the forces of such these positions talks first in comparison with the previous friends who cannot open any avenues.
To terminate the enumerated the reasons, thanks to the emergence of the new friend in one's life, the persons can obtain a myriad of privileges. In sum, not only will the person unearth the better and more practical ways to circumvent his problems, but also the new friends may predispose him to feel more joy and ecstasy owing to their presence bringing about more harmonies and accommodations. Furthermore, the one can reinforce his true potential and aptitudes to substantiate them to new persons. (502 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to surmount the challenges existing in ones life is not stealthy for anyone. Priori...
^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'convincing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: convincing
...he subsistence of a surge of challenges to convince the new person. Going into the depth, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ept is the new events and situations in ones life. To clarify, seldom does one not c...
^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s to the emergence of the new friend in ones life, the persons can obtain a myriad o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, broadly speaking, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2484.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24050632911 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04486735663 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561181434599 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6568611618 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29533777409 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851267398087 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066161816307 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164440192271 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733551713418 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 86.8835125448 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.