As cities become more crowded and cars increasingly fill streets and highways, many people believe that municipalities need to work harder to promote the use of public transit such as buses, trains, and subways. In many cases, though, the cost of doing this is too high or the public interest is too low.
- what can local governments do to make public transportation more attractive to residents?
- How can they fund these public transportation systems?
Provide detailed reasons and examples to support your answer.
As documented in researches, as the population grows, the roads are becoming more crowded by cars. Thus, some people claim that municipalities must offer a way to convince people to tend to use public transit instead of private vehicles, which is costly. I personally believe that the best attempt that cities can do is to increase the tax paying rate on citizens the reasons for which will be demonstrated in the following essay.
No need to say, people have always reacted positively to taxes and became disciplined in any areas. To put in simple, before tax-paying method, people used to buy fuels, cloths and other things much more than they needed, but after the governments imposed the taxes on many aspects of life, individuals became less affordable to buy everything in any amount they wanted, and consequently tended to purchase whatever they really needed. To relate this to people’s transportation, when the government imposes more money in crowded roads on private-owned cars, citizens would tend to use buses, trains, and metros rather than automobiles. For example, last year the government of Islamic Iran raised the price of fuels for cars, and after several months you could realize how much the traffic had become lighter and the public conveyances more crowded. On the other hands, local authorities also can make people more aware of this phenomena, using the local public transport and not the cars, by raising taxes.
Indeed, in order to lead people into crowd transit, governments can fund on providing awareness campaigns using the money which has been accumulated from citizen’s taxes. As a matter of explanation, everybody needs to know that why and how they want to use for example subways; it would not be done until some social networks make people convinced that subways are not only less tax-free but also more affordable, convenient, environmentally responsible, and importantly safer. More precisely, after imposing more money on riding car in the streets and highways, still some people would tend to use their own vehicle because they think they have more money, cars are more convenient, and public means of transit are not suitable for them. Therefore, special campaigns can result in awareness of those people about advantages of using group transportation.
To sum up, by raising levy on automobiles, governments of cities can kill two birds with one stone; they will not only attract people's attention into community transport but also make people more disciplined and aware about mass services using people’s own money for their own self financially.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e demonstrated in the following essay. No need to say, people have always react...
^^^
Line 2, column 931, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ties also can make people more aware of this phenomena, using the local public trans...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt and not the cars, by raising taxes. Indeed, in order to lead people into cro...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antages of using group transportation. To sum up, by raising levy on automobile...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, really, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20665083135 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80742812286 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558194774347 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3731109161 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.615384615 100.406767564 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3846153846 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244514862209 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905433422557 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355865016572 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15274524808 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043781552308 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 11.7677419355 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.