College students should be required to take basic economics courses, even though their majors are not economics.
Some people believe that taking basic economic courses may benefit any college students. However, I am against such statement and strongly believe that such enforcement only has drawbacks.
To begin with, necessiating basic economics courses may amplify dissatisfaction among students. Even though knowledges in basic economics can be helpful in some degrees, but it will only cause negative effects once this policy is implemented. This is especially true in some area that is apart from such disciplines such as art major, music major. For example, a university in Seoul implemented similar policy, taking a financial classes as a prerequisite course, and conseqently students showed big concerns toward such policy. For students, they were dissatisfied with taking such courses regardless of their own will. This dissatisfaction would impede students' will to study. Thus, considering the morale of students, requiring students to take such courses will only negatively affect to the students.
In addition, requiring students to take such courses may reduce proficiency on some fields. When students take subjects that is irrelevant to their fields, they lose chances to develop more profound knowledge on their field of study. Most students have to graduate within 8 semesters and the courses that they can enroll are limited. But when they take a course which teaches them 'basic' and 'irrelevant' information, the time spent on taking such courses becomes useless. For instance, one of my collegues regreted his freshman year and were very pessimistic toward required courses since he never learnt something either professional or useful for his future job. Many students found it unnecessary and skipped the classes often. If school did not implemented such courses, he would have spent time on more relevant courses or some curriculum that would motivate him to work hard. Therefore, taking any courses as mandatory would even disturb some students to develop profound knowledge.
To sum, even though basic economic courses may seem to be beneficial to anyone, it needs serious consideration since it would only discourage students' motification and deprive students' opportunity to build up more deeper understanding toward their career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'class', 'classis'?
Suggestion: class; classis
...nted similar policy, taking a financial classes as a prerequisite course, and conseqent...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rse, and conseqently students showed big concerns toward such policy. For student...
^^
Line 5, column 748, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'implement'
Suggestion: implement
...ed the classes often. If school did not implemented such courses, he would have spent time ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: deeper
...eprive students opportunity to build up more deeper understanding toward their career.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eper understanding toward their career.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52173913043 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82852514667 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6446789484 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29311108563 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959480867159 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612095200761 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187057439724 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461017871056 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.