Directions: Read the question below. Give yourself 30 minutes to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words.
Reading Time: 30 minutes
Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is important that the teachers must have deep knowledge of the subject they taught. However, it is more important for a teacher to relate the subject being taught well with students for the following three reasons.
First of all, if the subject being taught is related well with students then they understand concepts better. Understanding concept must be given prime importance as concepts sets up basis of students, which eventually help them in future to grasp the subject easily. For instance, consider the example of newton’s laws of motion. If teacher is unable to relate newton’s law then most likely they will face difficulty in studying physics. Hence, it is beneficial for students if teacher can teach them while relating well.
Secondly, this ability of teacher to relate well can make students more interested towards the subject being taught. Subsequently, the students will take study with more enthusiasm and hence, grasp the content efficiently. For example, in a physics class if the teacher is able to explain with experiments or real-life scenarios, they will get more eager to learn the subject. Thus, once interest comes, the knowledge comes naturally, as now the students will read on their own and will cover more deeper aspects of the subject.
Finally, if teacher is able to teach well while relating things, then the boring subject could look easier and interesting. For instance, I considered chemistry as a way too boring subject as I can’t remember the reaction equations and element names. However, in 12th standard a new teacher came and has completely my perspective of chemistry. He made chemistry to look too easy for me. This is only possible because of his peculiar ability of relating chemistry with the common names of people, places, etc.
In conclusion, while it is necessary to have enough knowledge of subject to taught students, but at the same time it is more important to relate things well such that the students find is easier and interesting to learn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is important that the teachers must h...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents for the following three reasons. First of all, if the subject being taugh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the example of newton’s laws of motion. If teacher is unable to relate newton’s la...
^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: deeper
...s will read on their own and will cover more deeper aspects of the subject. Finally, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the common names of people, places, etc. In conclusion, while it is necessary to ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11144578313 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64996569571 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515060240964 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4461658466 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8235294118 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0416133480361 0.236089414692 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0161557747238 0.076458572812 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0211483020813 0.0737576698707 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0264812836047 0.150856017488 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201695503668 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.