Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
In this argument, the author claims that inoculations against cow flu might save people in the affected area. In contrary to this argument, the author further claims that there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of this inoculations against cow flu. To support this point of view, the arguer has suggested not to permit this inoculations against cow flu. Though the underlying reasons sounds good and reasonable, because of lack of evidence, unaddressed assumptions, and vague terminology, the aurthor's argument is unsubstantiated and deeply flawed.
First and foremost, the author cities about the areas where the cow flu is detected. Author has nowhere mentioned about the method of detection of cow flu. Futhermore, if there a detection method, the author didn't mentioned about the correctness of the method of detecting the cow flu. In a nutshell, the claim of author is flawed due to uncertainity in reliablity of the method of detecting cow flu.
Secondly, even though if the assumption of disease detected in certain area is correct, the author is still uncertain about the inoculation against cow flu. The argument claims that the inoculation might save the people. Without checking the reliablity of this inoculation, commenting on saving lives is completely absurd.
Contrary, the argument latter claims about the possiblity that due to this inoculation, a person might die. Hence, he further argued that inoculations against cow flu cannot be permitted. He citied here about the small possiblity of person dieing. Again the question comes here is checking the correctness of inoculations. The author can't comment on this without actually knowing the outcomes of this inoculations against cow flu. This inoculation must have been tested beforehand and the author should mention about the exact possibility, i.e in terms of mathematical number, to check the reliability on this inoculation.
Hence, the argument lacks the thorough analysis and reliable statistics. The author should have investigated about the actual possibility of a person dieing from this inoculation. Furthermore, he should also look into the chances of saving the life from this inoculation. Finally, he has mentioned the term routinely administered everywhere in the argument, he should have further elucidate.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 365 350
No. of Characters: 1907 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.371 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.225 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.91 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.381 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.972 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.365 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.573 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.184 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y that a person will die as a result of this inoculations against cow flu. To suppor...
^^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the arguer has suggested not to permit this inoculations against cow flu. Though th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...if there a detection method, the author didnt mentioned about the correctness of the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...correctness of inoculations. The author cant comment on this without actually knowin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ithout actually knowing the outcomes of this inoculations against cow flu. This inoc...
^^^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his inoculation. Hence, the argument lacks the thorough analysis and reliable...
^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'elucidated'.
Suggestion: elucidated
...in the argument, he should have further elucidate.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 16.3942115768 134% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 363.0 441.139720559 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4132231405 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9961106263 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443526170799 0.468620217663 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.76447105788 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8622638046 57.8364921388 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5714285714 119.503703932 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 23.324526521 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269972754877 0.218282227539 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100808857262 0.0743258471296 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763431808838 0.0701772020484 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16402827018 0.128457276422 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622496496015 0.0628817314937 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.