All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Nowadays, the demand and value for consultants has reached the pinnacle. Every company tries to hire the consultants to fill the void in the company's working efficiency. The issue here cities the hiring of outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. Furthermore, the issue also argues about that if the company were to spend more time listening to their own employees, then these consultants would not be of any requirement.
All companies have some or the other problems, no company can be a perfect working model. Hence, there will be some void in company's working. These problem may include, management problems, low wages problem of employees, problem due to financial loss of company, lack of harmony between employees, etc. Hence, to rectify these problems consultants are the best choice. However, the company hires outside consultants rather than listening to their own employees.
Outside consultants may not understand the exact problem going in the company. To further illustrate it, suppose the problem in the company is due to fight between employees or managers, the consultant can not figure out these type of problems. In addition to this, trusting outsider is not a great idea. Instead of trusting outsider, the owner or CEO of company should spend more time with their employees in order to figure out the problem. Owner or CEO of particular company can also prefer an informal discussion with each of the employee, to listen the new and creative ideas from their employee. The most useful suggestion or advice can be received only from the working team of employees as they have experienced working in company and they know the company better than the outsider.
Apart from this, company will have to pay the consultants and due to the rising demand for consultants, the company may not able to met there requirements.
In conclusion, it is better for the company to spend some more time with employees and listen to their queries, problems, advice or suggestions to promote the growth of company and hence to operate more effectively and efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'These problems'?
Suggestion: This problem; These problems
... will be some void in companys working. These problem may include, management problems, low w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'wages'' or 'wage's'?
Suggestion: wages'; wage's
...m may include, management problems, low wages problem of employees, problem due to fi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, apart from, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12716763006 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.734776097 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473988439306 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.051910619 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.352941176 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.554228560396 0.243740707755 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198494572323 0.0831039109588 239% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138318695039 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349021749732 0.150359130593 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148359648623 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.