Discuss the advantages of promotion based on seniority or performance and provide your point of view.
Many people in my country envision working for one organization their entire lives. This is because they do not want to start hunting for jobs again. I posit that almost nobody would deny a promotion within the company he or she works for. But how should promotions be granted? This paper will discuss the advantages of promoting people based on their seniority or performance. A short conclusion will wind it up.
On one hand, promoting people based on their seniority is acknowledging the effort they've put in for the development of the company. Doing so will encourage junior employers to work hard to ensure that they become senior employees as well. For example, my cousin Albert had worked for Bill Farm, an agricultural firm in Senegal, for 20 years when he got promoted to the position of C.E.O. Elisa, his sister who was a junior in the company, ensured that she never quit it as a result of her brother's promotion. Over a period of 10 years, she was promoted, so were many other people within the organization. Promoting workers based on the time they spent in a firm is an effective way to keep the ones who really know the company and can improve it outcomes.
On the other hand, performance-based promotions are great means to encourage people to work hard within their company. In fact, when everybody knows that if they are going to work their way up through working hard, they will be prompted to do so. This will create a positive professional competition in the company and increase the productivity. As an example, when I was an academic assistant at Bridge2Rwanda, they promoted me to become the leader of the teams of academic assistants because my students performed way better than others. Because of my promotion, my colleague named Chris worked harder than me in the following year and his students outperformed mine. Our competition helped us give our students the best of us; consequently, we improved the mission of the Bridge2Rwanda high school. Granting promotion based on an employee's performance will enable them to work hard in order to avoid becoming average workers.
In my opinion, it's better to promote people based on their performance at work. Promoting according to the time one has spent in the company is unfair because being a senior does not necessarily mean being the most productive. The most productive employers should be the ones getting promoted because they are the ones ensuring that the organization is making profit and running properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...r seniority is acknowledging the effort theyve put in for the development of the compa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... school. Granting promotion based on an employees performance will enable them to work ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, really, so, well, for example, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92417061611 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81103887098 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518957345972 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7042019933 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9523809524 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17360320486 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653197666447 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785811806554 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123345843321 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234019477363 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.