Do you agre or disagree with the following statement? leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The source of leadership is the source of debates for long periods. While there are some people who believe that controlling is learned from the outside; the other people, on the other hand, think it earns intrinsically. In general, I do concur with the first group, in what follows, I will list the most conspicuous reasons to rear my standpoint.
The first striking reason which should be considered is a varied requirement of management in the various fields. Indeed, the leading principle alters according to the demands of the managing fields. For instance, a manager of an industry sector deals controlling the labors performance, machines status, required raw materials, and marketing the products. On the other hand, a manager of the hospital has to concern about the patients and the service provided by the hospital. As listed, there is a difference between these two leaderships and their requirement. While the factory owner mostly worries about finance, the hospital manager concerns on the social and health factors. Consequently, the required methods for the management and leading of these two zones vary and requires different background which the intrinsic ability will not accountable for them.
Another equally noteworthy point which should be highlighted is the physical appearances are conveyed by the genetic are naturally leadership is not a physical feature to deliver naturally. According to the noteworthy, intelligence study conducted in the Psychology Department of Tehran University, approximately the eighty-five percent of the intrinsic features earned by an individual is physical features, and the behavioral attitude earns through the environment. The leading manner which is also a behavioral feature is learned through the environment. This finding also verified as the different management courses exist and teach the people how to become a successful leader. If this feature was an intrinsic one, there would not be this much advertisement for teaching the management skills. Also, any child of a good manager should become a great leader, while, some samples do not show this expectation.
However, there are some groups which believe that some people with their patient manner has more control over the issue, so there is a good leader. This group, unfortunately, overlooks the delicate point that patience does not guarantee success. Although it prevents from making the cautious decisions and pushes the person to deeply considered and evaluated the subject to make the right choice, as long as he does not possess the sufficient knowledge over the topic his patient will not aid him to become a successful manger. This patience is beneficial in the case which combines with the knowledge; therefore, the leader in the hazardous situations control his calmness and according to his background make the best decision in the short period without making the mistake.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly depict the sense of leading is obtained from the outside. The various technics of managing for different fields of activity and leadership as the attitude learned from the outside verifies this fact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'labors'' or 'labor's'?
Suggestion: labors'; labor's
...n industry sector deals controlling the labors performance, machines status, required ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2681.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38353413655 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88358517591 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504016064257 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2669299343 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.863636364 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102812557949 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317278916052 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278879905042 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609815393283 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245853256183 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.