As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
The author argues that by enhancement of knowledge, surrounding seems more vague and complicated instead of appearing lucidly. This is claim with which I generally disagree. In fact list of reasons give support to my favorable attitude toward the subject. In the following paragraphs I will delve into the most outstanding ones to illustrate my perspective.
The first reason, which advocates my idea, is that the chasm knowledge extends an individual's vision. It is lucidly obvious that knowledge like a spotlight lit the darkness and presents a clear insight about the ambiguous subject. In this case, if the individual in capable to utilize his or her cognitive ability and flourishes or elaborates his or her understanding, the subject will become more obvious. For instance, if in the past the people were not inclined to shed their narrow beams of knowledge on the subjects and did not broaden or foster them, we will not possess this enhanced technological stand which we own now. Consequently, the knowledge in the correlation with the humanity's imagination paves the path to the improvement and modern society.
The second exquisite reason, which gives an adherence to my viewpoint, is that the specific knowledge leads to possess shallow insight about the various subjects too. It is cogently explicit that approximately all sciences own some relationships with together; even in some cases this relationship is too dominant. For example, in my field of study which is architecture, I have the opportunity to get inform about the different subjects such as the climatology, sustainability, and psychology. Although my major is named architecture, as mentioned this course leads me to get familiar with the various fields of study and even in some cases which those various fields fitted with my desire, I boost my knowledge about that specific field too. Thus, by studying a regular course, the people will have a chance to inform about the different subjects which have the link with that regular subject.
Nonetheless, what I alluded to in the two paragraphs of the body should not be overgeneralized. In fact, the knowledge is a vast and chasm and endless source. As long as the person acquires the knowledge he or she feels the necessity of learning and gaining more knowledge. This sense of non-satisfy appetite leads the person to inform about the ability of knowledge and its infinite feature. However, it does not mean that the person faces the complexity, he or she possess the sufficient knowledge about the specific topic with the information about the deep roots of them and the requirement of learning more.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that although the knowledge is an endless resource, as it mentioned the knowledge causes the technological enhancement and the learning a specific subject leads to inform about the different subjects too. Actually there are bulks of reasons which confirm the accuracy of my idea which are not mentioned above; however, the most conspicuous ones are illustrated to depict the subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 468, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
... person faces the complexity, he or she possess the sufficient knowledge about the spec...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lead'?
Suggestion: lead
...ent and the learning a specific subject leads to inform about the different subjects ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17261904762 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97127570387 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46626984127 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6602626442 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803642459116 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303938490635 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620826483921 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572681974619 0.150359130593 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483169285552 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.