1. The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author asserts that each individual’s dignity is captured by the later generation rather than the people who live contemporary with that specific person. This is the claim with which I partially do concur. Among the countless rearing reasons which give adherence to my perspective, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to support my standpoint.
The first striking reason which appeals me to agree with this sentence is the scope of some achievements which are beyond the public’s understanding. In other word, for the sake of the upper level of genius in some feats, those accomplishments do not fit into the ordinary people’s level of appreciation. These mismatches mostly are occurred in the field of science, in which because of steps further intelligence in scientists; they propose or propound ideas which do not comprehend by the public with an ordinary level of cognition. A lucid example of the stated sentence which shed spotlights on the issue is the example of Nicolas Copernicus; an astrophysicist who posed the theory of heliocentrism. However, since this theory was completely against the religious belief of that period, he preferred to publish it secretly to not get the label of a heretic from church and people. This example lucidly shows that the above achievements, especially in the field of science, require extra time for better comprehension from the topic.
The second equal crux reason for accepting this claim is the credit of better understanding which is gained from a perspective that is aside from the phenomenon rather than from s center. In fact, the holistic and comprehensive appreciation is captured in the case which is steps beyond the topic; therefore, it can capture the topic from different and major perspectives. Furthermore, this comprehensive outlook gives the chance of better recognition from the topic. In this case, the gained recognition gives the chance of comparison and contrast of that specific event attributes with others; consequently, this situation lets for the proliferated understanding of the issue and its greatness. For example, all Gundi’s contributions are mostly admired after his death, since by the passage of time, the people get this holistic appreciation about his attempts for privileging the freedom spirits.
On the other hand, what is mentioned in the two above paragraphs should not be overgeneralized to all fields and achievements. Indeed, in some areas such as the sport and art, the talent and effectiveness get bolded as soon as they are presented in some platform. Besides, for the sake of fast and complete coverage of news by social media, these talents and greatness are got known very fast by the contemporary people. In addition, since the level of achievements are not beyond the people’s level of cognition, they applauded as soon as they are covered by media.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly depict that in some fields there should be the factor of time passage for possessing the better appreciation from the issue; however, some other fields get admired as soon as they get recognized by people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... soon as they get recognized by people.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 511.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23483365949 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10996156536 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485322896282 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6918939859 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.789473684 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8947368421 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139289324915 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462294197036 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037025153182 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786898177304 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400431108144 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.