The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Although there are many great man didn't get the reputation they deserved until long after their dead, as far as I concern, the statement that the gratness of individuals can only be decide by those who live after them is erronious as the history suggested otherwise. In many fields, many historical figures with great achievements changed history forever and it is impossible for anyone who live after them or their contemporaries can ignore the greatness of their achievement.
In the field of scientific reasearch, It is almost impossible for any contemporaries scientist to ignore those individuals among them who makes the greatest discovery. The unique ingenunity of these great discoveries is that not only these theories will stand true regardless of the passage of the time, but also become the fundation for many of the future discoveries. For example, the theroitical physicist Albert Einstien have already been considered as the greatest scientist at the time when he proposed the theory of relativity. New concepts the theory introduced changed the theroitical physics forever and it is bond to be a great achievement even a the point of view of a contemporarie scienties. What is more, even though scientist has made great deals of descovery since the theory was published, people haven't thought differently about Eistien until today because the theory of special relativity and general relativity are still considered one of the most important theory in mordern physics.
In the field of engineering, people can also recognize those individuals with great achievements from the same era. These great people, although their name may not be widely know by the public, but the great accomplishment they obtained changed the world and therefore be remembered by the history forever. For example, the Engineers who worked on the Apollo program will no doubt be one of the greatest engineers in the 20th centery. It is more than momentous for millions of people arounds the world to see Niel Amstrong makes his first step on the moon. Although the engineering achievement may not be everlasting as a scientific thory, it represents the progress of social development and marks a key point in history. In addition, not only does the engineering accomplished the impossible, but also changed the norm of our everyday life. For example, the GPS system, although it is a used by everyone, it is still a well-known engineering marvel. Hunderies of satelliets surrounding the earth can provide accruate navigation data for thousands of people around the world.
In summary, the greatest scientific or engineering achievements can always change the history forever, and as such achievement is known and tested by the contemporaries, the greatness of individuals can always be decided by the people from the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
Although there are many great man didnt get the reputation they deserved until ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In the field of scientific reasearch, It is almost impossible for any contempo...
^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'contemporaries'' or 'contemporary's'?
Suggestion: contemporaries'; contemporary's
...earch, It is almost impossible for any contemporaries scientist to ignore those individuals a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
... is bond to be a great achievement even a the point of view of a contemporarie scient...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 817, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... since the theory was published, people havent thought differently about Eistien until...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in summary, no doubt, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2422907489 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98799242645 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495594713656 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6595851887 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.75 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216055420326 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745783627959 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654444025983 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148808701784 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759756709762 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.