Do you agree of disagree with the following statement? Face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters and email. Use specific reasons and details to support your answers
communication has a crucial part in human life. Until now, it has undergone continues change such as, from cave painting to writing. we communicate face to face people by talking and using mimics, or we use other types of communication such as letters and email. In my opinion, face to face communication is better than other types of communication for two significant reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason is that face to face communication is much faster than communicating by writing letter of email. while they are talking face to face, they are here same place; therefore, they do not wait for answer. This type of communication continues spontaneously. However, communicating with letter and email is a long process because it takes too much time that typing communication reach receiver. For example, people sent letter to their relatives in order to communicate with them a hundred years ago. When a letter was sent, it would take a few months for the letter to arrive. As a result, other types of communication options are slower than face to face communication.
The second reason is that face to face communication decreases risk of misunderstanding. people emphasize their emotions through using mimics and chancing their voice tones while they are talking face to face with other people. On the other hand, they could understand each other wrong due to lack of facial expressions in writing letters and speaking on the phone. For example, people use emojis while texting in order to emphasize their emotion or feelings about something since it makes message much clearer.
To sum up, being much faster and declining misunderstanding risk are only two main reasons why face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters and email.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communication
communication has a crucial part in human life. Until...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...such as, from cave painting to writing. we communicate face to face people by talk...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. The first reason is that face to face co...
^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...mmunicating by writing letter of email. while they are talking face to face, they are...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ower than face to face communication. The second reason is that face to face c...
^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ion decreases risk of misunderstanding. people emphasize their emotions through using ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g since it makes message much clearer. To sum up, being much faster and declini...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09698996656 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97607375954 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508361204013 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.779737873 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519390702486 0.236089414692 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201054532065 0.076458572812 263% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136798878911 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370451156846 0.150856017488 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943877824362 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.