Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can cast doubt on the effects of one's friend on their happiness in their lives. The controversial question which arises here is whether, to being happy it is more important for people to have a smaller number of friends for a lomg time rather than making many new friends easily. I believe that having small number of friends is more beneficial for someone which wants to be happy. To support this there are several reasons two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason which comes to miy mind is that the ability of holding a friendship for a long time is very demanding, because in their relationship they have to pay painstaiking attention to each other. To be aware of the needs of each of our friends takes a lot of time, needless to say, only with having fewer number of friends is it achievable. As a result, people will have enought time for each of their friends and can feel the sense of happiness. For example, a couple of years ago, I had a lot of friends but I don not have much time to spend with all of them which make me feel upset, therfore I decided to reduce the circle of my friendship in order to stay satisfied.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into accout is that different people have different thinking caps, so it is irrational for a person to be friend with a lot of people and still feel good from their friendships. Having different thinking style brings about some confliction between peeople which make them far from each other, as a result, the frienship bound between them weakens and they cannot stand friend for a long time. Take my personal experience as a compelling example, during my high school, I have a large number of friends which have divided to different group with two different type of beliefes, staying friend with both of them made the situation hard for me to know myself, therefore I decided to matain my friendship with one which were closer to me in more aspects.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that having friendship with small number of people for a long time is more beneficial rather than making friends with a lot of people easily. The fact that being in a large friendship is very demanding and needs more time, coupled with the emergence of confliction and disagreement in larger friendship, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...No one can cast doubt on the effects of ones friend on their happiness in their live...
^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... example, during my high school, I have a large number of friends which have divided to different...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64965197216 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59051607229 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461716937355 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2008665516 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.153846154 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1538461538 20.6045352989 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314598626674 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135791492175 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084555943897 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231682312897 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602659715496 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.