Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are normally become tedium of their daily lives, which bring them lots of stress and anxiety. Friendships are very luctraive for people to change their lives' mood and become more relaxed. I strongly believe that capability of having friendships consists of few people, for a long time is outweighing the ability of making new friends in an easy way.
To begin with, long lasting friendships with only two or three members could help people to alleviate their stress and b happier. In fact, people with their old close friends have numerous memories in common, which by reviewing them they become able of having delightful moments. In contrast, with new friends, they have no communal past and by getting older they find complex to understand each others. My personal experience is a compelling example of what I mean. I have had two close friend sine my high school, which we have attended the same university as well. I admire my long period friendship with them because we have so many memories together, and we have done our bests to support our friendship. Gradually, I am becoming able to develop my bond with them, and I'm ready for any dime circumstances they may have to assist them. They reciprocately have helped me in any critical situations. If I were able to find new friends, I would not be as happy as now, spending my times with my old friends.
What is more, presently, people are becoming more introverted, which leads to many difficulties to make new friends. Everyone is busy with their own lives and regarding problems, so they don't have extra time to spend for a new friend. They prefer to hang out with their old bonds because the old ones are more flexible and supportive to their conditions.
To put it in a nutshell, I firmly believe that people should obtain the ability to maintain their old, small group of friends rather than being able to find new ones. It is momentous for themselves to have happiness and gratification. Old friendship with only few people is a great opportunity to talk about common memories and in this way, release their anxiousness. In addition, nowadays, people are truly busy, let alone, to be able making new friendship and spending time to develop their relationships, so it is better to continue with their previous close friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ghing the ability of making new friends in an easy way. To begin with, long lasting friendshi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'friend' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'friends'.
Suggestion: friends
...le of what I mean. I have had two close friend sine my high school, which we have atte...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g able to develop my bond with them, and Im ready for any dime circumstances they...
^^
Line 2, column 775, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...able to develop my bond with them, and Im ready for any dime circumstances they m...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n lives and regarding problems, so they dont have extra time to spend for a new frie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, regarding, so, well, i mean, in addition, in contrast, in fact, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81772151899 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65415722081 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524050632911 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1987628843 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.157894737 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259614611746 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914091442104 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570835696761 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186209971968 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246866937434 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.