Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All school teachers should be required to take courses every five years to update their knowledge.
It is an undeniable fact that teachers play a central role in a education system. Because of this fact, some people are inclined to the view that school educators should be obliged to improve their knowldege by taking certain classes each five year. However, I, for the one, firmly believe that there is no need for all school teachers to take classes in order to update their knowledge. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
To begin with, there are other ways that teachers can improve their knowledge through them. Nowadays, with the unprecedented growth of technology, almost everybody have access to the Internet. Cosequently, teachers can remain up-to-date using this spectacular possibility. My experience is a compelling example of this reason. As a master student, I was required to be the teaching assistant for a bachelor's course. During my sessions, I had to solve the assignments for the students. Sometimes, some students ask me questions about the state-of-the-art usage of the course in technology. Using the material on the Internet, I was able to locate some very specific answers to their questions. Furthermore, teaching is a two-way road; in other words, because teachers have to deal with students all the time, their knowledge is improving through their direct touch with students. For instance, because students ask challenging questions from their teachers all the time, the educators who have to find the appropriate answers are being imprved in this way.
Secondly, school teachers often teach some basic courses that do not change significantly with time. In other words, the purppose of most of the given courses in schools is to only give an insight about the fundamental grounds of a particular subject so that after being familiarized with that topic students can make an awared choice about their major in university. As a result, and because of the fact that the basics do not change a lot with time, the teachers do not need to be that much updated. For example, the basic rules and axioms of mathemcatics do not chnage a lot with time.
To wrap it up, I strongly assert that teachers should not be required to take courses in order to improve their knowledge. Because not only are there other means through which they can remain updated, but also they often teach some basic topics that do not change a lot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ct that teachers play a central role in a education system. Because of this fact,...
^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...r major in university. As a result, and because of the fact that the basics do not change a lot with tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98232323232 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73788968823 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492424242424 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3949154181 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.65 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314957574982 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937182283794 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826973336778 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203775877728 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331907871417 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.