Knowing about history has always been a matter of controversy among people. Regarding this issue, people have never stopped debating about whether or not history courses have to be part of every field of study in universities. Although it seems plausible at first glimpse that history courses should be a section of different fields of study, I would counter this point of view due to some reasons. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, learning about history takes too long since there are a number of distinctive stories about various periods, also it is not practical, so it does not let students allocate enough time to their other lessons. To clarify this point, history books are often too long and a considerable amount of time should be dedicated to them. In addition, in the fast-pacing world of today, those stories cannot be used since they talk about obsolete problems which ancient people faced them. As a result, the allocation of time to reading history is a sheer waste of time and universities should not make students participate in those courses.
The other reason which deserves some words here lies in the fact that forcing people to do some things has always had a converse impact on them, thus if universities push students to get history courses regardless their field of study can make the history too disgusting for students. In other words, all universities should let students choose their favorite courses since students usually do not pay enough attention to the courses which they must opt. In that case, it is more likely for students to select history courses enthusiastically, so they think of themselves as those who have to take part in history classes actively. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. When I was in university, the university's staff required students to get some special theology courses in spite of their fields of study. Therefore, students only attended those courses physically and they did not focus on them. In addition, they only wanted to get a mark with which they could pass the classes. As a result, not only it did not add any knowledge to students, but also it made students too upset about theology.
To sum up, given the facts that student have to assign a long time to read history books which can be used in other important courses and make a requirement for students to take part in history classes can have converse effect, I vehemently believe that universities should let students to select whether they want to participate in history classes or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...eople have never stopped debating about whether or not history courses have to be part of ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1129, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to upset'?
Suggestion: to upset
... to students, but also it made students too upset about theology. To sum up, given the f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, i mean, in addition, as a result, in other words, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87248322148 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63945320305 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478747203579 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9458397293 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.117647059 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2941176471 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295091390873 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968811026344 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545139989523 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185249523655 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425848313624 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.