From my personal experience, I disagree with this statement.
First, if history courses are made mandatory for all students regardless of their majors or fields, students will then be obliged to choose history courses and pay for extra tuition fees accordingly. Hence this practise will definitely overwhelm students with extra financial burdens, most of which are already far too cumbersome even without compulsory history courses. And if any university should make history courses compulsory, not elective, we have to question the very purpose underlying such an inflexible requirement: is this for the common good or is this purely for the sake of money? It is highly possible that university will take advantage of this decision to rake in extra profits in the name of some so-called 'interdisciplinary development', which is not only unethical but also sordid. Therefore, I can hardly subscribe to this statement which might provide an opportunity for universities to rob students of their hard-earned cash.
Second, I highly doubt whether there are sufficient professors capable of teaching so many history lectures. Professors at this university are bound to give a lot of extra lectures if all students are required to take history courses, not just students from the history department. But who will be responsible for undertaking such a strenuous task? Professors at the history department are already very busy with their daily businesses, and they might hardly get around to giving extra lectures. Yet you can hardly count on someone with minor or no background knowledge about history! Even if qualified professors at the history department do find some spare time to teach these lectures, the quality of their lesson will also be seriously questioned in so far as they are too occupied to focus their effort on teaching. And if these cases prove true, students can hardly learn anything from a coarsely-prepared history class even if they sit in the classroom for hours.
Third, it is totally unfair for students to take history class whose major has little or nothing to do with history. For instance, if you are a student majoring in social science, then it still makes some sense if you are required to learn history given the immanent association between the two subjects. However, if you are a student majoring in computer science, I certainly see no point in taking a senseless history class in so far as it is totally unnecessary for you to learn history in order to become a competent computer engineer. And if students are deprived of their rights to choose from whatever they wish to learn, not from whatever they are required to learn, a clamorous outcry will come from them and this stupid decision will surely backfire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...pay for extra tuition fees accordingly. Hence this practise will definitely overwhelm...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, third, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11086474501 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81472466026 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505543237251 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6402303136 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0625 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1875 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246245212702 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923197380322 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490823841703 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157490665526 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258107673014 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.