Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering the fact, human being is known as social creature, many of the characteristics have a significant part in his success. These traits include honesty, faithfulness, and responsibility. I believe that truth will be best foundation for any relationship. Reasons for that I will explain in ensuing paragraph.
First, telling the truth to your close people means that you have a trust on them. To have healthy relationship person should have trust on each other which can be achieve by honesty. We always observe that husband and wife get conflicts in their relationship when they are not being honest with each other. One whose always not truthful tends to live with the fear of getting caught or punished thus wasting more time to make up more lies which is not going to settle any situation in any relationship nor the peace of mind to be themselves.
Secondly, there is saying that “Honesty is the best policy.” Its apply to all type of relationship. Here I will explain about friendship. In friendship truth will help to motivate the friend and help him/her to become successful in their life. For example, when my friend asks me to review his article which he was about to publish. If I will not tell him his mistakes about his paper then he will not come know about it. By explaining the errors about his journal, I am making his paper better, he will not feel bad about it. Honesty helps people achieve success in their life. Also, it helps people to maintain their relationship for long period of time. If person is honest then people trust him/her more they can make more relationship in their life.
In conclusion, always telling the truth people gain trust and success. It also helps to eradicates fear, saves time and gives peace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...sponsibility. I believe that truth will be best foundation for any relationship. Reason...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t I will explain in ensuing paragraph. First, telling the truth to your close p...
^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... article which he was about to publish. If I will not tell him his mistakes about ...
^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...to maintain their relationship for long period of time. If person is honest then people trust ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r relationship for long period of time. If person is honest then people trust him/...
^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'eradicate'.
Suggestion: eradicate
...ain trust and success. It also helps to eradicates fear, saves time and gives peace.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84488448845 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6950140199 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547854785479 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5494232287 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2631578947 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122570203063 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419279788604 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481227483216 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869408339884 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467688170949 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.