Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In the rising population, human needs are increasing day by day. They need to figure out fully feel their basic necessity without harming nature. Many people believe that humans should stop destroying the forest for land because forests are home to animals. On the other hand, some people argue that land for farm, house, and industry is more essential then endangered animals’ homes. I believe that land should be preserved for the rare animal species for several reasons. It helps to balance the ecosystem, increase the economy, and transfer knowledge to the future generation.
First, animals are the foundation of a healthy ecosystem. Humans depend on the ecosystem for many reasons such as clean air, water, and food. Human grows their food by agroecosystem, but they also eat animals from the natural ecosystem. If we want to maintain the natural cycle of the ecosystem, then humans should protect endangered animals. This balance is difficult to maintain: the loss of one species often triggers the loss of others. When grey wolves were hunted to near extinction in Yellowstone National Park, beaver populations also decreased significantly. This is because elk, without the wolf as its predator, grazed more heavily on plants needed by beavers for winter survival.
Second, humans are busy developing new things and as a result of that, they are destroying nature to fulfill their desires. People destroy forests to use the land, whereas, animals lose their homes. On the other side, if forest preserve for animals it can become a tourist place. For instance, Gir jungle is famous in India to preserve lions. It not only protects lions from getting extinct but also, ecotourism generates revenue for the government. Thus, protecting spare animals not only helps the ecosystem but as well the country’s economy.
Lastly, rare animals provide opportunities for scientists to conduct research on them to explore the importance of that species for humans. Further, if rare animals are not protected then future generations will lose the chance to learn about them.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that humans should save endangered species because they play a crucial role in the ecosystem. Also, they help to generate money for belonging country by ecotourism. Moreover, in the future people should get the opportunity to explore these species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-28 | Mina.2020 | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | MotherAstronaut | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Rapidbirthday21 | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Rapidbirthday21 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | cocoza@gmail.com | 87 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People behave differently when they aren t in health Do you agree that health status influences the way people behave 75
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 80
- Summarize the point made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented in the reading passage.In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia, a type of a evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started ti d 80
- The wide spread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today’s world? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
..., house, and industry is more essential then endangered animals’ homes. I believe t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, then, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24603174603 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62360380778 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568783068783 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8919184551 48.9658058833 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.625 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237156189739 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688844211756 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540577069214 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136326693216 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474200045722 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.