The social association has attracted much social concern. Some people believe that always telling the truth is the most vital consideration in any relationship. Personally, I bear a strong agreement on this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is relationship bonding. The fact is that always being honest creates chances for a person to deliver the messages of sincere concerns to other ones. Therefore, it naturally builds up affection and increases mutual communication between people. As a result, they are supposed to more appreciated and get closer to each other. Consequently, it plays a crucial role in proving that always following the truth stimulates the development of the social relationship. More importantly, it cannot be denied that always saying the truth possesses a large probability for people to strengthen the belief in their social associations. It leads to the fact that they gradually remove the barrier in their connection with others and initiate sharing very private things such as personal perspectives, studying or working troubles, etc. On that ground, needless to say, it is able for people to acknowledge each other more thoroughly. As a consequence, their relationships are certain to be stabilized. By and large, always being trustworthy actually enhances the bonding of the relationships.
On the other hand, some people might hold a thought that always showing the truth can extremely frustrate other ones. Accordingly, it sets serious damage to the relationship. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that, even when the truth is very terrible, the way of expressing has a strong influence on the listener. It follows that people are always bound to choose a subtle way to present the fact and put everything under control. Furthermore, it is common knowledge that risking telling the truth is a very arduous task to anyone. Correspondingly, always voicing the truth stands a golden chance for people to have a habit of going through difficult circumstances in their lives. For this reason, it is expected to provide them with intrepid and confident feelings to pull though other obstacles in their associations such as misunderstanding or conflicts. This, in turn, forms a significant contribution to enhancing the balance of the relationships. Subsequently, always conveying the truth greatly fortify the bonding of the relationship. Beyond any doubt, the idea that being straightforward severely harm relations is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my writing. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to make an appropriate decision on interacting with other people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1060, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'being'.
Suggestion: being always
...certain to be stabilized. By and large, always being trustworthy actually enhances the bondi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38443935927 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18553387276 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551487414188 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5816585789 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8076923077 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204512631154 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053271944652 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580885632717 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128674501555 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317268531458 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.