Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.
Today's modern society has always been seeking a practical way to make life complexity more comfortable. In response to the question of whether young social members should have the ability of planing since modern life is complicated, Personally, I reckon the idea it is an absolute necessity for youngsters to be able to plan. I will develop my standpoint for two conspicuous reasons which have been stated in the ensuing lines.
The first worthwhile mentioning reason is that the power of planning prepares inexperienced youths for facing unexpected events. In fact, being able to make a plane beforehand doing anything empower young people to handle obstacles in their way of life. As a young man, my experience, when coronavirus hit my country is a compelling example of this. Last year, I made a solid plan to apply for an American university, but due to coronavirus, a 3-month-lockdown took place in my country everywhere. Consequently, I was worried about whether how I can take my TOEFL exam which was necessary for my application. Therefore, I made a plan to take my exam in the first reopening centers of taking TOEFL in which avoiding the next lockdown. In the summer I took TOEFL, however, since last week the centers have been locked down, again. Had I never planed for taking TOEFL in the summer, I would not have taken TOEFL, now, due to the unforeseen new lockdown.
The second significant point to be mentioned is that through planning young people would be able to carry on time-consuming tasks far easier in this modern era that everyone is short of time. My experience in designing a park plan is an apt example of this. Last summer I signed a contract of designing a neighborhood park in Sardasht, my hometown, besides that I had to take TOEFL, two time-consuming work. As a result, I came up with a plan of dividing my daytime into two parts to be able to handle the situation: till noon studying English and from noon till the night working on the project of designing a park. Had no capability of making a plan, I would not carry on both of them together.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I strongly believe that the ability to plan for young social members is paramount. This is because not only do plans prepare youngsters for facing unforeseen events in their life, but that also help young people to make the most time-consuming tasks easy to carry on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...lexity more comfortable. In response to the question of whether and to what extend young social members...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... handle obstacles in their way of life. As a young man may experience when coronav...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, i reckon, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72380952381 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.830346565 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507142857143 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3817823894 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21311719109 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696787664213 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502048108658 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151348333244 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607128235569 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.