Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The
The most important goal of education is to teach people how to
educate themselves.
Humanity has been learning through history using varied ways such as education. There is a controversial hotly-debate whether the main purpose of education is teaching social members how to educate by themselves or not. It is my firm conviction that the paramount importance aim of education is teaching people self-educating. Stating in the ensuing paragraphs, I will elaborate on my standpoint through the two most conspicuous reasons.
The first worth mentioning point to champion my stance is that it is almost impossible for learners to be taught by others all their life thereby they should learn after a stage of their span of life to educate be themselves. To put it in the other words, after a while, reaching a level of knowledge, there will be no one to learn from; actually, it the time of attaining new knowledge through researching, for example. Assuming a friend who has done his Ph.D. is a compelling instance to further illustrate. Omid, my friend, last year defended his thesis and now he is working in an institute related to environmental protection. Carrying on new research on how to increase the level of pollutants released by factories, he has invented a new, effective method to be used by polluted factories aiming to protect the environment. Had he never learned self-education, he could not have come up with his invention.
The second remarkable reason to endorse my outlook and further clarification is that the boundary of science will not expand unless education raises learners through the way of self-education. To be more specific, it is obviously clear the only way of exceeding the existed boundary of science is science production which is obtainable only by those people who learned to educate by themselves. Being created new fields of study are apt proofs of this claim. Olmsted, the founder of landscape architecture, is one of those individuals that established this field in the early nineteen-century in the US. If education did not teach him self-learning, he would not be able to establish landscape architecture in which expanded the boundary of science.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I profoundly believe that the first priority of education is instructing people how to learn by themselves. This is because it is the only option for acquiring new knowledge after a while of education. What is more, it is the one option of expanding science's boundary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sciences'' or 'science's'?
Suggestion: sciences'; science's
...more, it is the one option of expanding sciences boundary.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, look, second, so, while, for example, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08291457286 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12072540402 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9152677106 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.388888889 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169327906561 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549916123247 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769365495166 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119901201459 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820923871206 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.