In a group project, it is better to divide the project and everyone takes a part of that to do lonely, or the whole group does the project together. which one do you prefer?
Doing Group projects is a hotly-debate topic in every society in which how they should be done. Opinions are divided whether it is far better a group-project carried out by the whole group at the same time, or dividing the project and each member of the team takes a part of that to do. Personally, it is my firm opinion that every member should be assigned a part of the Project then do it lonely. I will develop my perspective for two crystal clear reasons, which have been presented in the ensuing paragraphs.
First of all, the main drawback of teamwork is distracting which can be removed if the members of the team carry out their responsibilities separately. More specifically, not knowing each other, when a group gets together their desire of socializing as the nature of the human begins makes them talk about any things else but not the project whereas through separating the group this central problem could be solved immediately. My experience of participating in a group-project is an apt illustration of this. Last year I was offered to lead a team participating in an international competition for landscape designing. At first, we were gathering in a class day by day, but the progress of the project was far away from what we expected since the team could not focus accurately on their duties because of too many interactions. Consequently, I came up with the idea that the team should be broken-down in which everyone had to do his/her part of the project at home; then the group gets together for revising once a week. As a result, the project was accomplished by the deadline. Were the group not separate, we would not meet the deadline.
Secondly, when the members of the group work lonely, they tend to have their works done perfectly, avoiding seen as the hinder of the project progress in the other's eyes, leading to more efficiency. In the other words, they wholeheartedly dedicate themselves to the project perfectly. In fact, being observed, people fulfill their duties reluctantly, which ends in the results not as perfect as when they are free of observation. Back to my example of the landscape designing project, after separating the group, one of the teammates did not his duties by the first weekly revising; he felt kind of humiliating, which made him more determined to have the best work done in the following weekly revising. Further, he became the most effective member of the group since not only did he do his responsibilities, but also helped others in the group; he did far more than was his duty. Had I not separated the group to fulfill their taken-part of the project, he maybe could have not been the most effective person for the team.
To wrap up, I reckon that dividing the project in which everyone carries out a part of the project has more edges because there will be no distraction from the others that the worst part of the group-working is being distracted. Besides, it results in more efficient work since all members do their best to be in the center of the focus and get other's attention.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, i reckon, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2528.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76082862524 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83758714312 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478342749529 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4443653921 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.4 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.55 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400694990857 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137529019767 0.076458572812 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109996811584 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28273530259 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839394185605 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.