Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The youngsters' abilities, the foundations of young people's development, have been valued and even trigger a heated discussion over whether it is crucial for youngsters to have the ability to plan and organize. The abilities of planning and organizing, in many people's views, are not important for young people. Contrary to these people's opinions is my perspective that these abilities are vital for youngsters, due to the contributions to sterling qualities and necessary skills.
What must be prioritized is that the necessary planning and organizing abilities, instead of not important abilities, are beneficial to young people's crucial qualities, by fostering their persistence and independence. To begin with, only by participating in the process of planning and organizing things, can young people learn how to persist. In detail, because I arranged my study plans, I needed to finish them every day, so I had to work hard every day, which promoted my persistence; on the other hand, under no circumstances can students reap and harvest the benefits of improving persistence. Moreover, never can we ignore the significance of planning and organizing for youngsters' independence. To explain it further, when I am organizing the campus math competition, I have to solve many tough problems by myself, so I can learn much about how to deal with issues independently; in contrast, will doing other things boost young people's independence?
What is equally worth discussing is that when planning and organizing activities, rather than doing other things, students can cultivate their necessary skills, by boosting their interpersonal skills and teamwork skills. First, it is well-known that by organizing large parties, youngsters can promote their interpersonal skills. To be specific, it is crucial for me to communicate with other people when I am the leader of a party organization, so in this whole process, I need to talk with others a lot and communicate with others a lot, which can actually improve my interpersonal skill; however, it is impossible for me to foster my interpersonal skill if I do not plan this party. Furthermore, when young people need to plan with other people, their teamwork skills will be facilitated. Specifically, when I worked in the company, I had to plan a meeting with my colleagues, so I needed to communicate with each one and find the best time to meet; on the contrary, there is no chance for me to improve my teamwork if I do not plan this meeting.
Sterling qualities, the foundation of youngsters' success, can be boosted if they have the ability to plan and organize. Necessary skills, the bedrock of young people's development, should be facilitated when they try to plan and organize things. In conclusion, only by having the ability to plan and organize, instead of not having, can young people reap numerous benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits of improving persistence. Moreover, never can we ignore the significance of ...
^^
Line 3, column 908, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...issues independently; in contrast, will doing other things boost young peoples indepe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he bedrock of young peoples development, should be facilitated when they try to p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19396551724 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10827868813 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.913801147 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.625 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231702907858 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102090374618 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440688889121 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169373227772 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241650311768 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.