Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History, one kind of course in the universities, has been valued and triggers a heated discussion over whether all university students need to take history courses regardless of what their field of study is. History courses, in some people's views, are not necessary for youngsters. Contrary to these people's opinions is my perspective that taking history courses can benefit young people, due to the contributions to their academic performance and sterling qualities.
What must be prioritized is that learning history courses, instead of not studying these courses, is beneficial to youngsters' academic learning, by extending their knowledge and cultivating their interests. To begin with, only by studying history courses, can college students reap and harvest a wide range of expertise. In detail, when we learn more about world history, like French Revolution, the world wars, and many countries' history, we would know many significant phenomena and the stories of their backgrounds; on the other hand, under no circumstances can we reap such a large amount of knowledge if we do not learn history. Moreover, never can we ignore the significance of history courses to students' interests. To be more specific, the more we go deep into history, the more we will be stimulated by famous scientists and great statesmen, and we will be interested in studying some fields; however, it is impossible for students to know more about these outstanding people.
What is equally worth discussing is that taking history classes, rather than learning other courses, is favorable to young people, by fostering their persistence and innovation. First, it is well-known that there were many distinguished persons who made successes because of persistence. Specifically, Steven Jobs, who was the CEO of Apple company, once was fired by his co-workers, but he never gave up, and finally he returned to the company and made Apple the biggest company in the world; in contrast, there is no chance for us to learn about his story if we do not learn history. Furthermore, we can learn about substantial celebrities who were successful because of innovation. To explain it further, we can also learn from the last example of Steven Jobs that he was innovative, and he redefined the concept of the mobile phone by inventing the iPhones; on the contrary, can we know the importance of innovation if not studying history?
Academic performance, the foundation of students' success, can be boosted if they learn more about history. Sterling qualities, the bedrock of students' development, should be facilitated, when they take history courses. In conclusion, only by requiring to take history courses, instead of not requiring them, can universities help students to reap numerous benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ch Revolution, the world wars, and many countries history, we would know many significant...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, of course, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2947845805 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96098067956 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496598639456 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7277194956 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.9375 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5625 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211540060125 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845527250931 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638316880788 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152651035587 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587446684414 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.