Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's modern world, thanks to these new technologies that become available for people, lives have been changed dramatically compared to the past. While some believe that with these quick changes, people feel sad and unsatisfied, others think otherwise. As far as I am concerned, I believe that people nowadays feel much happier and more satisfied with their lives than before. The reasons why I think so will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, by these new changes, new and better technologies are available for people. Technologies are designed to make life much easier. People in the past had many issues in their lives. Sometimes they had problems providing their basic needs, such as water. For instance, in the past, people in my city had to dig wells in their yards or go to subterranean canals to gain water. Sometimes that water was not healthy, but they did not have any other choice. Also, they had to use oil lamps in the nights to provide light. On the other hand, nowadays, thanks to new technologies, people have permanent access to clean water and electricity. I believe when people think about what gift they possess these days, they feel really happy and grateful.
Second, thanks to now available online sources of information, people do not feel limited to the place they live. They can see what is going on in the world. Some use the internet to gain new opportunities and goals in life. Having new goals and ambitions give a spirit to life. People in the past were usually obliged to continue their parents' jobs because they did not know anything about other careers. In contrast, nowadays, people have access to wide information about almost any career in the world. For example, now a child who lives in a remote village does not have to be a farmer or pastoralist like his father. He or she can become an astronaut or whatever they want. The idea that they can improve in life and they are not limited makes people happy about their life.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe that people nowadays feel more happiness and satisfaction in comparison to people in the past. They have access to new technologies that make their life more comfortable, and they can pursue their goals in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- p 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 70
- TPO 42 Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO 42 Integrated Writing Task 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82307692308 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50971157755 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5915111221 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.375 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220969123122 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669784077468 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566803512731 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156530305903 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462236572655 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.