Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers.
In this fast-changing world nowadays, the idea of lives in the past are simpler hence happier is everywhere from whether the post-modernists artists or normal citizens. I personally disagree with such assertion because I think there’s some misunderstanding in those ideas, which I will elaborate the details in the following paragraph.
The first reason is about the misconception saying that people in the past are happier and more satisfied because we tend to long for an idyllic live style but ignore the hidden disadvantage and dark side during the time period before science was born. From a perspective of a person living in this modern, it’s reasonable to make such assumption. However, it’s just that people in the past were bothered by other factors compared to the presents, which therefore, it’s fair to say that people in the past weren’t happier. In fact, according to statistic, more than half of the farmers and families died from severe famine and diseases, which I think it’s pure horrible.
Secondly, just to make things clear, disagreeing doesn’t necessary means that I believe lives nowadays are happier. In fact, I think it remains the same throughout history. I want to start with an almost over-used slogan “technology originates from humanity”, because that perfectly explains why people weren’t more satisfied and happier. To put that into a real-world context, if people were happy with what they had in the past, the invention of many astonishing technology and the industrial revolution in the 19th century, which were started due to the dissatisfaction of their status quo, just wouldn’t have happened.
In summary to what has been illustrated and discussed above, the idea that people are less happy and less satisfied doesn’t hold because it’s an mistaken image based on the misunderstanding of the idyllic live, and meanwhile, it contradicts with how fast the society is being improved, which is based on dissatisfaction and desire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tatus quo, just wouldn’t have happened. In summary to what has been illustrated ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ess satisfied doesn’t hold because it’s an mistaken image based on the misundersta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i think, in fact, in summary, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2893081761 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9852226268 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.6038293181 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.909090909 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 5.45110844103 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300893184695 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978365806512 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589134343381 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174685332239 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248266787789 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.