More and more people who use travel course packages have been increasing recently. They travel with a tour guide who knows the country well. However, there is an argument regarding this. Some people view that travel course packages lead people to an enjoyable travel while others oppose. In my point of view, I strongly believe that traveling with a tour guide is not the best way to enjoy a trip. I have two reasons with regard to my opinion.
To begin with, if people have a tour by themselves, they can enjoy what they want to see and experience. Traveling as a group has a specific course which a travel agency picked up. Hence, we ought to follow what they picked up, not the things that people really want to tour. To illustrate, I have experienced this case before. I have been visiting some countries with my family. In one country, we used tour guide courses, and it remains to me as a bad memory. We could not enjoy our trip. We should have followed what the tour guides wanted. Also, there was not enough rest time for us. The worst point was that we could not experience what we really hope to see.
Next, if one team does not arrive on time, we have to wait for them and time to start the trip is delayed. To be more specific, the following trip course is not for only me or my family. Numerous people should follow the tour guide. So it can be complicated while we travel. Furthermore, we should wait for the team that did not follow a group, or lost on the road. Hence, the time cannot help but delay gradually. I have a compelling example of this. When I was traveling in Italy, our family applied for a travel package, and we confirmed the place that we would meet. Since we arrived at the place and until we started to travel, the time was delayed about 20 minutes due to one family. They misunderstood our meeting place.
In conclusion, I disagree with this statement. Because people cannot enjoy their travel sufficiently. Moreover, the time can be delayed if one team is late.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
More and more people who use travel cour...
^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'enjoyable travel'.
Suggestion: enjoyable travel
...t travel course packages lead people to an enjoyable travel while others oppose. In my point of vie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wo reasons with regard to my opinion. To begin with, if people have a tour by ...
^^^
Line 6, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lusion, I disagree with this statement. Because people cannot enjoy their travel suffic...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime can be delayed if one team is late.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49453551913 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36239595087 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489071038251 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8525723552 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.724137931 100.406767564 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.6206896552 20.6045352989 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.62068965517 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202512092871 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620603762673 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622767469439 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133721428841 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449138171261 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.0 11.7677419355 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 58.1214874552 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.87 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.