Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
During the last decades, the digital revolution has transformed every aspect of transportation. These days, more people are traveling than ever before thanks to the brand-new transportation systems. In this regard, the tourist industry has boosted all around the world. Fortunately, today, travel agencies’ services try to offer more qualified services including better tourist accommodations, lower tourist expenditure, and professional tour leaders to attract more customers. One of the heated debates in this realm is that whether it is better to travel in a group led by a tour guide. Although there might be some counterexamples, I would argue that travel under the guidance of a leader is the best way to enjoy your trip. Following reasons will further elaborate on this issue.
The most prominent point to be mentioned is that a professional tour guide often possesses a great ability to manage your time and money for different activities during a trip. In fact, the majority of people waste much time discovering the best sights and tourist attractions due to their lack of information. Besides, tour leaders mostly can introduce you some cost-effective optional tours such as urban tours, festivals, fairs that you might not be aware of them. Consider my own experience which can shed some light on this issue. Last year, I traveled to Yazd with my best friend. Surprisingly, we visited all the ancient places and enjoyed eating at the best restaurants in this city only by employing our tour leader's advice who was really experienced.
The second rationale behind my reason is rooted in the fact that being with a tour guide is the safest way for traveling. In other words, one who vacations particularly in another country is not familiar with the safety level of different locations of that place, its people, their culture or even their social norms. As a result, it may cause serious problems both consciously and sub-consciously. For instance, a friend of mine who traveled overseas had an awful experience which led to come back to her home country sooner than she was expected. Actually, she took a picture from a woman and her child without asking permission, and the woman’s husband called the police to solve the problem. Consequently, leaders can warn you about probable issues in that place, and prevent you from dangers.
To wrap it up, based on the ideas that were presented above I believe that the best way to take a trip is being with a tour guide since you can spend your time and money more efficiently, and travel safely. However, an important issue that must be mentioned is that we cannot use these ideas as a prescription for everyone regarding their different personalities and preferences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, however, if, may, really, regarding, second, so, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08628318584 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90179389751 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.508502656 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5238095238 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22432692856 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619368051009 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576538913486 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134895028174 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239381489046 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.