Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should only
study or play and don’t have to do household chores.
As the people's knowledge gets raised, their attentions toward the children's upbringing are increased too. Parents notice more to psychologists' councils to behave more beneficially with their children in comparison to the past. One of the questions among parents is that how much household chore they must determine for their children, or even more fundamentally one; weather they must give children any duty related to the household. Some people agree with the idea that the children should just study or play and not more; while others believe otherwise. I, personally, subscribe to this idea that it is more profitable for family to divide household among all the family members, even children. It brings families a cooperative spirit and a good family cohesion. It is not to mention that the children by making such a duty gain a lot of proper characteristics all of which are necessary for their future lives.
In first place, a loving family has many specific characteristics such as having cooperative spirit which can shape with some activities. Sharing households among members is the most effective among them. Parents are in the heart of a family that can make a good atmosphere in families. As the family cohesion and cooperation in family are concerned, they must identify individual's duty for each family member; I mean they must do household together and the children aren’t exception at all. What successes such a family is a reasonable cooperation. In fact, they must notice to the amount of school's duties of their children, their physical abilities and so forth along with considering the demands of children for playing. For instance, my mother required all of us, my siblings and me, to have some definite task in our home. I remember from my childhood that all of us had a duty during breakfasts, for example my little brother had to buy breeds for breakfast, and my sister had to prepare breakfast table. It makes our family a conspicuous one in our extended family because of our family cohesion.
Secondly, children carry most of their characteristics from their childhood and youth. I mean the family is the most important place in which the children learn many things and their character shape. It is crystal clear that the choosing every way of behaving with children bring them specific personality. Sharing household among members of families and give numbers of it to children prepare an atmosphere in which the children can learn some positive characteristics. They learn cooperation by which they can deal with their future group activities like schools task, work's task and so on. It is crystal clear that they are more energetic and happy compared with other children, those that didn’t do the household along with their parents. It comes from the atmosphere of their home. As all of us know the feeling of being in a group even small one like an immediate family, make human beings happy and energetic. A cooperative family shape such a group.
In summary, by taking all of these into account, in my opinion, the children must be given some households. These duties bring them some positive characteristic and spirit like happiness. The family also get a proper atmosphere in which the members are more close together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
As the peoples knowledge gets raised, their attentions...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in fact, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2733.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04243542435 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79392149696 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448339483395 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 861.3 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4791139933 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6071428571 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150405374493 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450484055422 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533103332677 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943414037812 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470424420471 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.