Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Without a shadow of doubt, traffic is one of the most important disadvantages of modern societies. Some people are proponents of the belief that governments should charge people for driving in busy city streets; however, others hold the opposite perspective and believe that government should not do such a thing and it should be free for people to drive anywhere they want, without regarding the amount of traffic. The idea, to which I subscribe, is the latter one. My viewpoint is based on quite a few reasons, two compelling ones of which have been elaborated upon hereunder.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that charging people to drive in the busy hours can push them to use public transport more often. In my experience, most of the time, people are not in favor of paying money to the government, therefore when they face with such a law, they would choose to use public transport instead of their personal cars. Additionally, it can decrease the traffic too, for the more people use the public transport, the less traffic would happen. My own experience is a good example of this matter. I used to live in Tehran and I had to drive to my working place every day and it took at least two hours to reach to the place, because of the heavy traffic. One day the municipality of our city stated that we had to pay a certain amount of money to drive in the busy hours, in which traffic was happening. Hence, I thought about the fee and since in my eyes it was more than I was willing to pay, from then, I took the bus to get to my office and interestingly, I got to realize that it was more efficient than I thought, for it took me just half an hour to get to my working place. Had I not tried public transport, I would not have realized such a thing.
The second noteworthy reason is that governments can use the fee to invest it in making new roads and developing public transport. Naturally, when people pay the fee to drive in the busy hours, the government would have a new source of income, which can be invested in improving roads and public transport which can eventually decrease traffic. A case in point is the same city which was mentioned in the last paragraph. After they charged people for driving in those busy hours, they allocated a large sum of money on making Bus Rapid Transit system (in short BRT) which gave us the opportunity to use busses, which had their own roads and would not face any traffic.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that it is better to charge people for driving in the busy hours, in which there are lots of traffic going on, for more people would use public transport, instead of their own cars and government can invest the money on building roads and improving public transport.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, at least, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6746031746 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70200434991 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460317460317 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.396897017 48.9658058833 285% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.285714286 100.406767564 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.6045352989 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205840024867 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782146377107 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452186623186 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136621871578 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205732245499 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.