By and large, it is established beyond doubt that the government these days are caring about the quality of the food more than before because of the society’s health. In my opinion, however, the opposite is true. This is due to the fact that the food was made by people and people have used fresh substances for their food. In what follows, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons for holding such a view.
The first compelling reasons corroborating my idea is that people often eat at restaurants because of the hectic life. In fact, people don’t have enough time to make the food by themselves. It is crystal clear that advertisements have got an important rule in choosing the restaurant. As a matter of fact, the proliferation of fast food restaurants is too spectacular. Therefore, people don’t pay attention to make the food by themselves, and they will be injured or sometimes killed because of the unsuitable substances which were used in the restaurant’s food. In the other hands, people in the past, especially mother of the family has cared about making food in the house because of the proper ingredients. For example, when we are going to my grandmother’s house, we eat delicious and healthy food because my grandmother believes that the food was made by mother of the family is the food of the heaven. This example clearly illustrates that if we had eaten more healthy food like our ancestors, we live healthier today.
Furthermore, because people cannot provide fresh food every day, they keep the food in their refrigerator. It is axiomatic that because humans spend most of their time in the terrific and in a way, they don’t have enough time to buy the fresh substances every day, which have got more nutritious. Moreover, if the food is made by the fresh substances, it would be more natural because the substances which were stored in the refrigerator has got a chemical interaction, which is dangerous for our body. So, people are trying to buy essential substances of their food in the weekend and preserve them in the refrigerator. For instance, my friend always brings fresh fruit every day in our workplace. Conversely, I eat the fruits that are remained and I feel that my friend’s fruits are healthy and also have got a better taste. So, I decide to buy an appropriate fruit recently. hence, our ancestors have got good habits, which have eaten fresh, that have not transformed into the current era.
By perusing the above paragraphs although mankind tends to buy fast food since they don’t have enough time to make, I personally contend that, in the past, people were eating more healthy food. This is owing to the food was prepared by people and know about ingredients, and people haven’t frozen the food because of the chemical reactions. A recent study, conducted at Sharif University, reveals that the people who were living about 50 years ago have got more vigorous body because of their food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 889, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...e to buy an appropriate fruit recently. hence, our ancestors have got good habits, wh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a matter of fact, by and large, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93253968254 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84640840645 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450396825397 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6386312115 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.086956522 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9130434783 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.60869565217 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216695706261 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733336914299 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745599947823 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153474299004 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757688550647 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.